Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Apostolis Tsorvantzis

dblp:352/5538 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0003-1884-3022ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.812024
Preferences Evolve and so Should Your Bandits: Bandits with Evolving States for Online Platforms · EC 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
recommendation systems
0.812024
Preferences Evolve and so Should Your Bandits: Bandits with Evolving States for Online Platforms · EC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.5multi-armed bandit · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Preferences Evolve and so Should Your Bandits: Bandits with Evolving States for Online Platforms
abstract
Online platforms that deliver ads and general recommendation systems are now integral to our daily routines. These platforms aim to maximize user engagement with their content, whether it involves ads or general recommendations. And yet, for all of their importance, researchers are still struggling to fully capture which factors drive user engagement on these platforms. Understanding these factors can not only unlock the possibility of increased revenue for the platforms, but can also help increase user satisfaction. Despite the multitude of models put forth to explain user engagement behavior, most focus on short-sighted/myopic preferences; i.e., users are assumed to make engagement decisions not caring about their prior interactions with the platform. In this paper, we take a different approach and aim to model users' evolving preferences.
Khashayar Khosravi, Renato Paes Leme, Chara Podimata, Apostolis Tsorvantzis
EC4