Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Trushkin

dblp:352/6209 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-7063-5616ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
1.012026
Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026
Information theory › signal processing
signal recovery
1.012026
Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
1.012026
Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics
0.312026
Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational complexity
smoothed analysis
0.312026
Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

small-ball method · 2.0l1 minimization · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing
abstract
Arbitrary matricesM∈ Rm×n, randomly perturbed in an additive manner using a random matrixR∈ Rm×n, are shown to asymptotically almost surely satisfy the so-calledrobust null space property. Whilst insisting on an asymptotically optimal order of magnitude formrequired to attainunique reconstructionvia ℓ1-minimisation algorithms, our results track the level of arbitrariness allowed for the fixed seed matrixMas well as the degree of distributional irregularity allowed for the entries of the perturbing matrixR. Starting with sub-gaussian entries forR, our results culminate with these allowed to have substantially heavier tails than sub-exponential ones. Throughout this trajectory, two measures control the arbitrariness allowed forM; the first is ∥M∥∞ and the second is a localised notion of the Frobenius norm ofM(which depends on the sparsity of the signal being reconstructed). A key tool driving our proofs isMendelson’s small-ball method (Learning without concentration, J. ACM, Vol. 62, 2015).
Elad Aigner-Horev, Dan Hefetz, Michael Trushkin
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3