Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Trushkin
dblp:352/6209
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-7063-5616ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026 |
Information theory › signal processing
signal recovery |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational complexity
smoothed analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Smoothed Analysis in Compressed Sensing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
small-ball method · 2.0l1 minimization · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Smoothed Analysis in Compressed SensingabstractArbitrary matricesM∈ Rm×n, randomly perturbed in an additive manner using a random matrixR∈ Rm×n, are shown to asymptotically almost surely satisfy the so-calledrobust null space property. Whilst insisting on an asymptotically optimal order of magnitude formrequired to attainunique reconstructionvia ℓ1-minimisation algorithms, our results track the level of arbitrariness allowed for the fixed seed matrixMas well as the degree of distributional irregularity allowed for the entries of the perturbing matrixR. Starting with sub-gaussian entries forR, our results culminate with these allowed to have substantially heavier tails than sub-exponential ones. Throughout this trajectory, two measures control the arbitrariness allowed forM; the first is ∥M∥∞ and the second is a localised notion of the Frobenius norm ofM(which depends on the sparsity of the signal being reconstructed). A key tool driving our proofs isMendelson’s small-ball method (Learning without concentration, J. ACM, Vol. 62, 2015). Elad Aigner-Horev, Dan Hefetz, Michael Trushkin |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |