Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chloé Messdaghi
dblp:352/7115
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 87% Usable security · 13% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
human factors in vulnerability discovery |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Vulnerability Discovery for All: Experiences of Marginalization in Vulnerability Discovery · SP 2023 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Vulnerability Discovery for All: Experiences of Marginalization in Vulnerability Discovery · SP 2023 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Vulnerability Discovery for All: Experiences of Marginalization in Vulnerability Discovery · SP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-structured interviews · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Vulnerability Discovery for All: Experiences of Marginalization in Vulnerability DiscoveryabstractVulnerability discovery is an essential aspect of software security. Currently, the demand for security experts significantly exceeds the available vulnerability discovery workforce. Further, the existing vulnerability discovery workforce is highly homogeneous, dominated by white and Asian men. As such, one promising avenue for increasing the capacity of the vulnerability discovery community is through recruitment and retention from a broader population. Although significant prior research has explored the challenges of equity and inclusion in computing broadly, the competitive and frequently self-taught nature of vulnerability discovery work may create new variations on these challenges. This paper reports on a semi-structured interview study (N = 16) investigating how people from marginalized populations come to participate in vulnerability discovery, whether they feel welcomed by the vulnerability discovery community, and what challenges they face when joining the vulnerability discovery community. We find that members of marginalized populations face some unique challenges, while other challenges common in vulnerability discovery are exacerbated by marginalization. Kelsey R. Fulton, Samantha Katcher, Kevin Song, Marshini Chetty, Michelle L. Mazurek, Chloé Messdaghi, Daniel Votipka |
SP | 6 |