Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruo-Jing Dong

dblp:352/8680 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 54% Learning paradigms · 41% Information extraction and text analysis · 5%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
A Lens into Interpretable Transformer Mistakes via Semantic Dependency · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › model debugging
model error analysis
0.912025
A Lens into Interpretable Transformer Mistakes via Semantic Dependency · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability
0.912025
A Lens into Interpretable Transformer Mistakes via Semantic Dependency · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-label classification
label-specific feature learning
0.712023
Can Label-Specific Features Help Partial-Label Learning? · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
partial label learning
0.712023
Can Label-Specific Features Help Partial-Label Learning? · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning
0.712023
Can Label-Specific Features Help Partial-Label Learning? · AAAI 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
semantic dependency parsing
0.312025
A Lens into Interpretable Transformer Mistakes via Semantic Dependency · ICML 2025
Machine learning and data management › label distribution learning
label enhancement
0.212023
Can Label-Specific Features Help Partial-Label Learning? · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty-aware confidence region · 1.3graph-based label enhancement · 1.3token attribution analysis · 0.9probing · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Lens into Interpretable Transformer Mistakes via Semantic Dependency
abstract
Semantic Dependency refers to the relationship between words in a sentence where the meaning of one word depends on another, which is important for natural language understanding. In this paper, we investigate the role of semantic dependencies in answering questions for transformer models, which is achieved by analyzing how token values shift in response to changes in semantics. Through extensive experiments on models including the BERT series, GPT, and LLaMA, we uncover the following key findings: 1). Most tokens primarily retain their original semantic information even as they propagate through multiple layers. 2). Models can encode truthful semantic dependencies in tokens in the final layer. 3). Mistakes in model answers often stem from specific tokens encoded with incorrect semantic dependencies. Furthermore, we found that addressing the incorrectness by directly adjusting parameters is challenging because the same parameters can encode both correct and incorrect semantic dependencies depending on the context. Our findings provide insights into the causes of incorrect information generation in transformers and help the future development of robust and reliable models.
Ruo-Jing Dong, Yu Yao 0005, Bo Han 0003, Tongliang Liu
ICML1
2023 Can Label-Specific Features Help Partial-Label Learning?
abstract
Partial label learning (PLL) aims to learn from inexact data annotations where each training example is associated with a coarse candidate label set. Due to its practicability, many PLL algorithms have been proposed in recent literature. Most prior PLL works attempt to identify the ground-truth labels from candidate sets and the classifier is trained afterward by fitting the features of examples and their exact ground-truth labels. From a different perspective, we propose to enrich the feature space and raise the question ``Can label-specific features help PLL?'' rather than learning from examples with identical features for all classes. Despite its benefits, previous label-specific feature approaches rely on ground-truth labels to split positive and negative examples of each class and then conduct clustering analysis, which is not directly applicable in PLL. To remedy this problem, we propose an uncertainty-aware confidence region to accommodate false positive labels. We first employ graph-based label enhancement to yield smooth pseudo-labels and facilitate the confidence region split. After acquiring label-specific features, a family of binary classifiers is induced. Extensive experiments on both synthesized and real-world datasets are conducted and the results show that our method consistently outperforms eight baselines. Our code is released at https://github.com/meteoseeker/UCL
Ruo-Jing Dong, Jun-Yi Hang, Tong Wei 0001, Min-Ling Zhang
AAAI1