Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hyun Jae Oh

dblp:352/9069 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 72% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 28%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.522025
WINS: Winograd Structured Pruning for Fast Winograd Convolution · ICCV 2025
Balanced Column-Wise Block Pruning for Maximizing GPU Parallelism · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning
1.522025
WINS: Winograd Structured Pruning for Fast Winograd Convolution · ICCV 2025
Balanced Column-Wise Block Pruning for Maximizing GPU Parallelism · AAAI 2023
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
0.912025
WINS: Winograd Structured Pruning for Fast Winograd Convolution · ICCV 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › convolution optimization
winograd convolution
0.912025
WINS: Winograd Structured Pruning for Fast Winograd Convolution · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › structured pruning
block pruning
0.712023
Balanced Column-Wise Block Pruning for Maximizing GPU Parallelism · AAAI 2023
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU-accelerated machine learning
GPU inference optimization
0.712023
Balanced Column-Wise Block Pruning for Maximizing GPU Parallelism · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.212023
Balanced Column-Wise Block Pruning for Maximizing GPU Parallelism · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

winograd convolution · 1.7structured pruning · 1.7workload balancing · 1.3column-wise block pruning · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 WINS: Winograd Structured Pruning for Fast Winograd Convolution
Cheonjun Park, Hyun Jae Oh, Mincheol Park, Hyunchan Moon, Minsik Kim 0001, Suhyun Kim 0001, Myung Kuk Yoon, Won Woo Ro
ICCV2
2023 Balanced Column-Wise Block Pruning for Maximizing GPU Parallelism
abstract
Pruning has been an effective solution to reduce the number of computations and the memory requirement in deep learning. The pruning unit plays an important role in exploiting the GPU resources efficiently. The filter is proposed as a simple pruning unit of structured pruning. However, since the filter is quite large as pruning unit, the accuracy drop is considerable with a high pruning ratio. GPU rearranges the weight and input tensors into tiles (blocks) for efficient computation. To fully utilize GPU resources, this tile structure should be considered, which is the goal of block pruning. However, previous block pruning prunes both row vectors and column vectors. Pruning of row vectors in a tile corresponds to filter pruning, and it also interferes with column-wise block pruning of the following layer. In contrast, column vectors are much smaller than row vectors and can achieve lower accuracy drop. Additionally, if the pruning ratio for each tile is different, GPU utilization can be limited by imbalanced workloads by irregular-sized blocks. The same pruning ratio for the weight tiles processed in parallel enables the actual inference process to fully utilize the resources without idle time. This paper proposes balanced column-wise block pruning, named BCBP, to satisfy two conditions: the column-wise minimal size of the pruning unit and balanced workloads. We demonstrate that BCBP is superior to previous pruning methods through comprehensive experiments.
Cheonjun Park, Mincheol Park, Hyun Jae Oh, Minkyu Kim 0003, Myung Kuk Yoon, Suhyun Kim 0001, Won Woo Ro
AAAI3