Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Takumu Shimizu
dblp:352/9924
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Multi-agent systems · 89% Reinforcement learning · 11% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
automated negotiation |
2.1 | 3 | 2024 | Coordination of Emergent Demand Changes via Value-Based Negotiation for Supply Chain Management (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 Scalable Negotiating Agent Strategy via Multi-Issue Policy Network (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2023 Reward-Based Negotiating Agent Strategies · AAAI 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › automated negotiation
multi-issue negotiation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scalable Negotiating Agent Strategy via Multi-Issue Policy Network (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › automated negotiation
negotiation strategy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Reward-Based Negotiating Agent Strategies · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Coordination of Emergent Demand Changes via Value-Based Negotiation for Supply Chain Management (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Reward-Based Negotiating Agent Strategies · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
policy network · 1.3deep reinforcement learning · 1.3value function · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.8automated negotiation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Coordination of Emergent Demand Changes via Value-Based Negotiation for Supply Chain Management (Student Abstract)abstractWe propose an automated negotiation for a reinforcement learning agent to adapt the agent to unexpected situations such as demand changes in supply chain management (SCM). Existing studies that consider reinforcement learning and SCM assume a centralized environment where the coordination of chain components is hierarchical rather than through negotiations between agents. This study focused on a negotiation agent that considered the value function of reinforcement learning for SCM as its utility function in automated negotiation. We demonstrated that the proposed approach could avoid inventory shortages under increased demand requests from the terminal customer. Takumu Shimizu, Ryota Higa, Katsuhide Fujita, Shinji Nakadai |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Reward-Based Negotiating Agent StrategiesabstractThis study proposed a novel reward-based negotiating agent strategy using an issue-based represented deep policy network. We compared the negotiation strategies with reinforcement learning (RL) by the tournaments toward heuristics-based champion agents in multi-issue negotiation. A bilateral multi-issue negotiation in which the two agents exchange offers in turn was considered. Existing RL architectures for a negotiation strategy incorporate rich utility function that provides concrete information even though the rewards of RL are considered as generalized signals in practice. Additionally, in existing reinforcement learning architectures for negotiation strategies, both the issue-based representations of the negotiation problems and the policy network to improve the scalability of negotiation domains are yet to be considered. This study proposed a novel reward-based negotiation strategy through deep RL by considering an issue-based represented deep policy network for multi-issue negotiation. Comparative studies analyzed the significant properties of negotiation strategies with RL. The results revealed that the policy-based learning agents with issue-based representations achieved comparable or higher utility than the state-of-the-art baselines with RL and heuristics, especially in the large-sized domains. Additionally, negotiation strategies with RL based on the policy network can achieve agreements by effectively using each step. Ryota Higa, Katsuhide Fujita, Toki Takahashi, Takumu Shimizu, Shinji Nakadai |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2023 | Scalable Negotiating Agent Strategy via Multi-Issue Policy Network (Student Abstract)abstractPrevious research on the comprehensive negotiation strategy using deep reinforcement learning (RL) has scalability issues of not performing effectively in the large-sized domains. We improve negotiation strategy via deep RL by considering an issue-based represented deep policy network to deal with multi-issue negotiation. The architecture of the proposed learning agent considers the characteristics of multi-issue negotiation domains and policy-based learning. We demonstrate that proposed method achieve equivalent or higher utility than existing negotiation agents in the large-sized domains. Takumu Shimizu, Ryota Higa, Toki Takahashi, Katsuhide Fujita, Shinji Nakadai |
AAAI | 1 |