Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kushal Tatariya

dblp:353/1129 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-4714-5244ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 55% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 15%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
multilingual NLP
1.012026
How Good is Your Wikipedia? Auditing Data Quality for Low-resource and Multilingual NLP · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
layer-wise representation analysis
0.812024
Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Models · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
linguistic probing
0.812024
Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Models · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › multimodal language model
pixel-based language models
0.812024
Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Models · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
probing
0.812024
Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Models · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

auditing · 1.0vision transformer analysis · 0.8probing tasks · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 How Good is Your Wikipedia? Auditing Data Quality for Low-resource and Multilingual NLP
abstract
Kushal Tatariya, Artur Kulmizev, Wessel Poelman, Esther Ploeger, Marcel Bollmann, Johannes Bjerva, Jiaming Luo, Heather Lent, Miryam de Lhoneux. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Kushal Tatariya, Artur Kulmizev, Wessel Poelman, Esther Ploeger, Marcel Bollmann, Johannes Bjerva, Jiaming Luo, Heather C. Lent, Miryam de Lhoneux
ACL (1)1
2024 Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Models
abstract
Pixel-based language models have emerged as a compelling alternative to subword-based language modelling, particularly because they can represent virtually any script.PIXEL, a canonical example of such a model, is a vision transformer that has been pre-trained on rendered text.While PIXEL has shown promising cross-script transfer abilities and robustness to orthographic perturbations, it falls short of outperforming monolingual subword counterparts like BERT in most other contexts.This discrepancy raises questions about the amount of linguistic knowledge learnt by these models and whether their performance in language tasks stems more from their visual capabilities than their linguistic ones.To explore this, we probe PIXEL using a variety of linguistic and visual tasks to assess its position on the vision-to-language spectrum.Our findings reveal a substantial gap between the model's visual and linguistic understanding.The lower layers of PIXEL predominantly capture superficial visual features, whereas the higher layers gradually learn more syntactic and semantic abstractions.Additionally, we examine variants of PIXEL trained with different text rendering strategies, discovering that introducing certain orthographic constraints at the input level can facilitate earlier learning of surface-level features.With this study, we hope to provide insights that aid the further development of pixelbased language models. 1
Kushal Tatariya, Vladimir Araujo, Thomas Bauwens, Miryam de Lhoneux
EMNLP1
2024 CreoleVal: Multilingual Multitask Benchmarks for Creoles
abstract
Abstract Creoles represent an under-explored and marginalized group of languages, with few available resources for NLP research. While the genealogical ties between Creoles and a number of highly resourced languages imply a significant potential for transfer learning, this potential is hampered due to this lack of annotated data. In this work we present CreoleVal, a collection of benchmark datasets spanning 8 different NLP tasks, covering up to 28 Creole languages; it is an aggregate of novel development datasets for reading comprehension relation classification, and machine translation for Creoles, in addition to a practical gateway to a handful of preexisting benchmarks. For each benchmark, we conduct baseline experiments in a zero-shot setting in order to further ascertain the capabilities and limitations of transfer learning for Creoles. Ultimately, we see CreoleVal as an opportunity to empower research on Creoles in NLP and computational linguistics, and in general, a step towards more equitable language technology around the globe.
Heather C. Lent, Kushal Tatariya, Raj Dabre, Yiyi Chen 0002, Marcell Fekete, Esther Ploeger, Li Zhou 0010, Ruth-Ann Armstrong, Abee Eijansantos, Catriona Malau, Hans Erik Heje, Ernests Lavrinovics, Diptesh Kanojia, Paul Belony, Marcel Bollmann, Loïc Grobol, Miryam de Lhoneux, Daniel Hershcovich, Michel DeGraff, Anders Søgaard, Johannes Bjerva
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2