Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kushal Tatariya
dblp:353/1129
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-4714-5244ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 55% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 15% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
multilingual NLP |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | How Good is Your Wikipedia? Auditing Data Quality for Low-resource and Multilingual NLP · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
layer-wise representation analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
linguistic probing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › multimodal language model
pixel-based language models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
probing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
auditing · 1.0vision transformer analysis · 0.8probing tasks · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | How Good is Your Wikipedia? Auditing Data Quality for Low-resource and Multilingual NLPabstractKushal Tatariya, Artur Kulmizev, Wessel Poelman, Esther Ploeger, Marcel Bollmann, Johannes Bjerva, Jiaming Luo, Heather Lent, Miryam de Lhoneux. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Kushal Tatariya, Artur Kulmizev, Wessel Poelman, Esther Ploeger, Marcel Bollmann, Johannes Bjerva, Jiaming Luo, Heather C. Lent, Miryam de Lhoneux |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language ModelsabstractPixel-based language models have emerged as a compelling alternative to subword-based language modelling, particularly because they can represent virtually any script.PIXEL, a canonical example of such a model, is a vision transformer that has been pre-trained on rendered text.While PIXEL has shown promising cross-script transfer abilities and robustness to orthographic perturbations, it falls short of outperforming monolingual subword counterparts like BERT in most other contexts.This discrepancy raises questions about the amount of linguistic knowledge learnt by these models and whether their performance in language tasks stems more from their visual capabilities than their linguistic ones.To explore this, we probe PIXEL using a variety of linguistic and visual tasks to assess its position on the vision-to-language spectrum.Our findings reveal a substantial gap between the model's visual and linguistic understanding.The lower layers of PIXEL predominantly capture superficial visual features, whereas the higher layers gradually learn more syntactic and semantic abstractions.Additionally, we examine variants of PIXEL trained with different text rendering strategies, discovering that introducing certain orthographic constraints at the input level can facilitate earlier learning of surface-level features.With this study, we hope to provide insights that aid the further development of pixelbased language models. 1 Kushal Tatariya, Vladimir Araujo, Thomas Bauwens, Miryam de Lhoneux |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2024 | CreoleVal: Multilingual Multitask Benchmarks for CreolesabstractAbstract Creoles represent an under-explored and marginalized group of languages, with few available resources for NLP research. While the genealogical ties between Creoles and a number of highly resourced languages imply a significant potential for transfer learning, this potential is hampered due to this lack of annotated data. In this work we present CreoleVal, a collection of benchmark datasets spanning 8 different NLP tasks, covering up to 28 Creole languages; it is an aggregate of novel development datasets for reading comprehension relation classification, and machine translation for Creoles, in addition to a practical gateway to a handful of preexisting benchmarks. For each benchmark, we conduct baseline experiments in a zero-shot setting in order to further ascertain the capabilities and limitations of transfer learning for Creoles. Ultimately, we see CreoleVal as an opportunity to empower research on Creoles in NLP and computational linguistics, and in general, a step towards more equitable language technology around the globe. Heather C. Lent, Kushal Tatariya, Raj Dabre, Yiyi Chen 0002, Marcell Fekete, Esther Ploeger, Li Zhou 0010, Ruth-Ann Armstrong, Abee Eijansantos, Catriona Malau, Hans Erik Heje, Ernests Lavrinovics, Diptesh Kanojia, Paul Belony, Marcel Bollmann, Loïc Grobol, Miryam de Lhoneux, Daniel Hershcovich, Michel DeGraff, Anders Søgaard, Johannes Bjerva |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 2 |