Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Javed Lindner
dblp:353/1258
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | From Kernels to Features: A Multi-Scale Adaptive Theory of Feature Learning · ICML 2025 Critical feature learning in deep neural networks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
mean-field approximation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Kernels to Features: A Multi-Scale Adaptive Theory of Feature Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Critical feature learning in deep neural networks · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical mechanics · 0.9saddle point approximation · 0.9large deviation theory · 0.8gaussian process · 0.8field theory · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | From Kernels to Features: A Multi-Scale Adaptive Theory of Feature LearningabstractFeature learning in neural networks is crucial for their expressive power and inductive biases, motivating various theoretical approaches. Some approaches describe network behavior after training through a change in kernel scale from initialization, resulting in a generalization power comparable to a Gaussian process. Conversely, in other approaches training results in the adaptation of the kernel to the data, involving directional changes to the kernel. The relationship and respective strengths of these two views have so far remained unresolved. This work presents a theoretical framework of multi-scale adaptive feature learning bridging these two views. Using methods from statistical mechanics, we derive analytical expressions for network output statistics which are valid across scaling regimes and in the continuum between them. A systematic expansion of the network's probability distribution reveals that mean-field scaling requires only a saddle-point approximation, while standard scaling necessitates additional correction terms. Remarkably, we find across regimes that kernel adaptation can be reduced to an effective kernel rescaling when predicting the mean network output in the special case of a linear network. However, for linear and non-linear networks, the multi-scale adaptive approach captures directional feature learning effects, providing richer insights than what could be recovered from a rescaling of the kernel alone. Noa Rubin, Kirsten Fischer, Javed Lindner, Inbar Seroussi, Zohar Ringel, Michael Krämer, Moritz Helias |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | Critical feature learning in deep neural networksabstractA key property of neural networks driving their success is their ability to learn features from data. Understanding feature learning from a theoretical viewpoint is an emerging field with many open questions. In this work we capture finite-width effects with a systematic theory of network kernels in deep non-linear neural networks. We show that the Bayesian prior of the network can be written in closed form as a superposition of Gaussian processes, whose kernels are distributed with a variance that depends inversely on the network width $N$. A large deviation approach, which is exact in the proportional limit for the number of data points $P=\alpha N\to\infty$, yields a pair of forward-backward equations for the maximum a posteriori kernels in all layers at once. We study their solutions perturbatively, to demonstrate how the backward propagation across layers aligns kernels with the target. An alternative field-theoretic formulation shows that kernel adaptation of the Bayesian posterior at finite-width results from fluctuations in the prior: larger fluctuations correspond to a more flexible network prior and thus enable stronger adaptation to data. We thus find a bridge between the classical edge-of-chaos NNGP theory and feature learning, exposing an intricate interplay between criticality, response functions, and feature scale. Kirsten Fischer, Javed Lindner, David Dahmen, Zohar Ringel, Michael Krämer, Moritz Helias |
ICML | 2 |