Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tokio Kajitsuka
dblp:353/1681
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network expressivity
transformer expressivity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Are Transformers with One Layer Self-Attention Using Low-Rank Weight Matrices Universal Approximators? · ICLR 2024 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | On the Optimal Memorization Capacity of Transformers · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parameter counting · 1.7softmax approximation · 1.5boltzmann operator · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | On the Optimal Memorization Capacity of TransformersabstractRecent research in the field of machine learning has increasingly focused on the memorization capacity of Transformers, but how efficient they are is not yet well understood.
We demonstrate that Transformers can memorize labels with $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N})$ parameters in a next-token prediction setting for $N$ input sequences of length $n$, which is proved to be optimal up to logarithmic factors.
This indicates that Transformers can efficiently perform memorization with little influence from the input length $n$ owing to the benefit of parameter sharing.
We also analyze the memorization capacity in the sequence-to-sequence setting, and find that $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nN})$ parameters are not only sufficient, but also necessary at least for Transformers with hardmax.
These results suggest that while self-attention mechanisms can efficiently identify input sequences, the feed-forward network becomes a bottleneck when associating a label to each token. Tokio Kajitsuka, Issei Sato |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Are Transformers with One Layer Self-Attention Using Low-Rank Weight Matrices Universal Approximators?abstractExisting analyses of the expressive capacity of Transformer models have required excessively deep layers for data memorization, leading to a discrepancy with the Transformers actually used in practice.
This is primarily due to the interpretation of the softmax function as an approximation of the hardmax function.
By clarifying the connection between the softmax function and the Boltzmann operator, we prove that a single layer of self-attention with low-rank weight matrices possesses the capability to perfectly capture the context of an entire input sequence.
As a consequence, we show that one-layer and single-head Transformers have a memorization capacity for finite samples, and that Transformers consisting of one self-attention layer with two feed-forward neural networks are universal approximators for continuous functions on a compact domain. Tokio Kajitsuka, Issei Sato |
ICLR | 1 |