Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Niklas Mück

dblp:353/2157 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-9622-0762ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program verification · 69% Programming languages and type systems · 25% Compilers and program optimization · 6%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification › program logic
separation logic
1.922026
Endangered by the Language But Saved by the Compiler: Robust Safety via Semantic Back-Translation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2026
Destabilizing Iris · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Programming languages and type systems › type systems
type soundness
1.012026
Endangered by the Language But Saved by the Compiler: Robust Safety via Semantic Back-Translation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2026
Program verification › program logic › separation logic
iris
0.912025
Destabilizing Iris · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Program verification
program logic
0.912025
Destabilizing Iris · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Compilers and program optimization
compiler correctness
0.312026
Endangered by the Language But Saved by the Compiler: Robust Safety via Semantic Back-Translation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2026
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics
multi-language semantics
0.312026
Endangered by the Language But Saved by the Compiler: Robust Safety via Semantic Back-Translation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

separation logic · 1.9semantic back-translation · 1.0mechanized proof in rocq · 1.0SMT solving · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Endangered by the Language But Saved by the Compiler: Robust Safety via Semantic Back-Translation
abstract
It is common for programmers to assemble their programs from a combination of trusted and untrusted components. In this context, a trusted program component is said to be robustly safe if it behaves safely when linked against arbitrary untrusted code. Prior work has shown how various encapsulation mechanisms (in both high- and low-level languages) can be used to protect code so that it is robustly safe, but none of the existing work has explored how robust safety can be achieved in a patently unsafe language like C. In this paper, we show how to bring robust safety to a simple yet representative C-like language we call Rec . Although Rec (like C) is inherently “dangerous” and thus not robustly safe, we can “save” Rec programs via compilation to Cap , a CHERI-like capability machine . To formalize the benefits of such a hardening compiler , we develop Reckon, a separation logic for verifying robust safety of Rec programs. Reckon is not sound under Rec ’s unsafe, C-like semantics, but it is sound when Rec programs are hardened via compilation and linked against untrusted code running on Cap . As a crucial step in proving soundness of Reckon, we introduce a novel technique of semantic back-translation , which we formalize by building on the DimSum framework for multi-language semantics. All our results are mechanized in the Rocq prover.
Niklas Mück, Aïna Linn Georges, Derek Dreyer, Deepak Garg 0001, Michael Sammler
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1
2025 Destabilizing Iris
abstract
The separation logic framework Iris has been built on the premise that all assertions are stable , meaning they unconditionally enjoy the famous frame rule. This gives Iris—and the numerous program logics that build on it—very modular reasoning principles. But stability also comes at a cost. It excludes a core feature of the Viper verifier family, heap-dependent expression assertions , which lift program expressions to the assertion level in order to reduce redundancy between code and specifications and better facilitate SMT-based automation. In this paper, we bring heap-dependent expression assertions to Iris with Daenerys . To do so, we must first revisit the very core of Iris, extending it with a new form of unstable resources (and adapting the frame rule accordingly). On top, we then build a program logic with heap-dependent expression assertions and lay the foundations for connecting Iris to SMT solvers. We apply Daenerys to several case studies, including some that go beyond what Viper and Iris can do individually and others that benefit from the connection to SMT.
Simon Spies, Niklas Mück, Haoyi Zeng, Michael Sammler, Andrea Lattuada 0001, Peter Müller 0001, Derek Dreyer
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.2
2024 The Kleene-Post and Post's Theorem in the Calculus of Inductive Constructions
abstract
International audience
Yannick Forster 0002, Dominik Kirst, Niklas Mück
CSL3
2023 Oracle Computability and Turing Reducibility in the Calculus of Inductive Constructions
Yannick Forster 0002, Dominik Kirst, Niklas Mück
APLAS3