Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiahao Ai

dblp:353/3259 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
0.812024
Not all distributional shifts are equal: Fine-grained robust conformal inference · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.812024
Not all distributional shifts are equal: Fine-grained robust conformal inference · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Not all distributional shifts are equal: Fine-grained robust conformal inference · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.812024
Not all distributional shifts are equal: Fine-grained robust conformal inference · ICML 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities
causal inference
0.212024
Not all distributional shifts are equal: Fine-grained robust conformal inference · ICML 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities › causal inference
individual treatment effect
0.212024
Not all distributional shifts are equal: Fine-grained robust conformal inference · ICML 2024
Computational science and engineering
sensitivity analysis
0.212024
Not all distributional shifts are equal: Fine-grained robust conformal inference · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

f-divergence · 1.5distributionally robust optimization · 1.5conformal inference · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Not all distributional shifts are equal: Fine-grained robust conformal inference
abstract
We introduce a fine-grained framework for uncertainty quantification of predictive models under distributional shifts. This framework distinguishes the shift in covariate distributions from that in the conditional relationship between the outcome ($Y$) and the covariates ($X$). We propose to reweight the training samples to adjust for an identifiable shift in covariate distribution while protecting against the worst-case conditional distribution shift bounded in an $f$-divergence ball. Based on ideas from conformal inference and distributionally robust learning, we present an algorithm that outputs (approximately) valid and efficient prediction intervals in the presence of distributional shifts. As a use case, we apply the framework to sensitivity analysis of individual treatment effects with hidden confounding. The proposed methods are evaluated in simulations and four real data applications, demonstrating superior robustness and efficiency compared with existing benchmarks.
Jiahao Ai, Zhimei Ren
ICML1