Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luis Viornery

dblp:353/6018 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0001-2963-7879ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 77% Legged, aerial and field robots · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
jumping robot
0.212023
Achieving Extensive Trajectory Variation in Impulsive Robotic Systems · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

force control · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Achieving Extensive Trajectory Variation in Impulsive Robotic Systems
abstract
Robots that use impulsive mechanisms to achieve high-speed and high-powered motion are becoming more common and better understood, but control of these systems remains relatively rudimentary. Among robots that use spring actuation to generate motion, robot actuation and mechanisms are usually not controlled intentionally in order to achieve variation in the system's behavior, or they are controlled only roughly via adjustments made to the amount of energy stored in the mechanism. We describe the development, construction, and test of an impulsive catapult mechanism whose design is inspired by the grasshopper leg and for which extensive variation in the projectile trajectory is achieved by force control of the actuator that restrains the spring. As a step toward future controlled jumping robots, we give a detailed model of this system, validate this model experimentally, and explain how the actuator dynamics are critical to our ability to vary the system's trajectory using this approach. This work represents a novel approach to the control of spring actuated robots and illustrates how they can be controlled even under highly limiting actuator constraints.
Luis Viornery, Chloe Goode, Gregory Sutton, Sarah Bergbreiter
ICRA1