Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mehdi Chakhchoukh

dblp:353/7688 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-3967-0488ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics › visual analytics workflow
analytic provenance
0.712023
Understanding How In-Visualization Provenance Can Support Trade-Off Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visualization and visual analytics › information visualization › metadata visualization
provenance visualization
0.712023
Understanding How In-Visualization Provenance Can Support Trade-Off Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics
0.712023
Understanding How In-Visualization Provenance Can Support Trade-Off Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization evaluation
user study
0.212023
Understanding How In-Visualization Provenance Can Support Trade-Off Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Understanding How In-Visualization Provenance Can Support Trade-Off Analysis
abstract
In domains, such as agronomy or manufacturing, experts need to consider trade-offs when making decisions that involve several, often competing, objectives. Such analysis is complex and may be conducted over long periods of time, making it hard to revisit. In this paper, we consider the use of analytic provenance mechanisms to aid experts recall and keep track of trade-off analysis. We implemented VisProm, a web-based trade-off analysis system, that incorporates in-visualization provenance views, designed to help experts keep track of trade-offs and their objectives. We used VisProm as a technology probe to understand user needs and explore the potential role of provenance in this context. Through observation sessions with three groups of experts analyzing their own data, we make the following contributions. We first, identify eight high-level tasks that experts engaged in during trade-off analysis, such as locating and characterizing interest zones in the trade-off space, and show how these tasks can be supported by provenance visualization. Second, we refine findings from previous work on provenance purposes such as recall and reproduce, by identifying specific objects of these purposes related to trade-off analysis, such as interest zones, and exploration structure (e.g., exploration of alternatives and branches). Third, we discuss insights on how the identified provenance objects and our designs support these trade-off analysis tasks, both when revisiting past analysis and while actively exploring. And finally, we identify new opportunities for provenance-driven trade-off analysis, for example related to monitoring the coverage of the trade-off space, and tracking alternative trade-off scenarios.
Mehdi Chakhchoukh, Nadia Boukhelifa, Anastasia Bezerianos
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.1