Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aijing Gu

dblp:353/9197 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 56% Security and privacy of machine learning · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
inference attack
1.012026
PriGraph: Defending Against Inference Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Policy-Based Adversarial Perturbations · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference
1.012026
PriGraph: Defending Against Inference Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Policy-Based Adversarial Perturbations · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data processing
graph data privacy
0.312026
PriGraph: Defending Against Inference Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Policy-Based Adversarial Perturbations · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 1.0auxiliary classifier · 1.0adversarial perturbation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 PriGraph: Defending Against Inference Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Policy-Based Adversarial Perturbations
abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used in various domains, such as social networks and transportation networks. Previous research has shown that GNNs are vulnerable to inference attacks. Node Membership Inference Attacks (NMIA) on GNNs infer whether a set of graph data records belongs to the training graph data of a target model. Link Status Inference Attacks (LSIA) against GNNs aim to infer whether there exists a link between a pair of nodes in the graph used to train the target GNN model. Specifically, given black-box access to a GNN model, NMIAs and LSIAs are conducted by analyzing the outputs (e.g., confidence score vectors) from GNN models. The defense methods against these two score-based inference attacks face the challenges of achieving effective defense performance and maintaining the utility of GNN models. In this paper, we propose PriGraph, a defense mechanism to protect the node privacy and link privacy of training graph data, while maintaining the high accuracy of the target GNN models. PriGraph adds crafted adversarial perturbations to outputs of the target GNN model by deploying two key components, i.e., defense auxiliary classifier and adversarial perturbation generator, which are used to find the minimal adversarial perturbations that can reduce the attack accuracy while maintaining task performance of node classification. We evaluate PriGraph with different GNN models and multiple benchmark datasets. The results show that PriGraph can dramatically reduce the attack accuracy of NMIA and LSIA on GNNs, providing a superior trade-off between the model utility and privacy.
Meng Shen 0001, Aijing Gu, Qi Li 0002, Ke Xu 0002, Liehuang Zhu
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.3
2023 Blockchains for Artificial Intelligence of Things: A Comprehensive Survey
abstract
With the rapid advances in information and communication technologies, the Internet of Things (IoT) has become large and complex, bearing tremendous amounts of data and running devices in various scenarios. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, IoT can achieve superior information extraction, data analytics, and decision making, which has resulted in the revolutionized AI of Things (AIoT). AIoT can alleviate the pressure of storage, computation, and communication. Despite the promising features brought by combining AI technologies into IoT infrastructure, AIoT systems still face some serious challenges including inadequate efficiency, violation of security and privacy, lack of trust, and insufficient incentive. Blockchain featured by its distributed consensus and incentive mechanisms can be a promising technology for addressing the challenges in AIoT. AIoT employing blockchain is evolving with expectations of achieving efficient, secure, and trusted network activities. In this article, we first introduce the background of AIoT and blockchain. Then, we discuss the motivations for employing blockchain with its characteristics in AIoT. Furthermore, we comprehensively review existing solutions on blockchain for AIoT systems from the aspects of efficiency, security, privacy, trust, and incentive. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future research directions on blockchain for AIoT.
Meng Shen 0001, Aijing Gu, Jiawen Kang 0001, Xiangyun Tang, Xiaodong Lin 0001, Liehuang Zhu, Dusit Niyato
IEEE Internet Things J.2