Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Koji Noshiro

dblp:354/1139 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-4345-0530ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Multi-agent systems · 86% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 14%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed constraint optimization
1.422024
Counterexamples and amendments to the termination and optimality of ADOPT-based algorithms · Artif. Intell. 2024
Flaws of Termination and Optimality in ADOPT-based Algorithms · IJCAI 2023
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
distributed constraint optimization
0.712023
Flaws of Termination and Optimality in ADOPT-based Algorithms · IJCAI 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint optimization
0.212024
Counterexamples and amendments to the termination and optimality of ADOPT-based algorithms · Artif. Intell. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

termination proof · 1.3optimality proof · 1.3counterexample analysis · 1.3distributed constraint optimization · 0.8bounded error approximation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Distributed Performability Optimization for Multi-UAV Road Traffic Monitoring
Qingyang Zhang 0007, Koji Noshiro, Mohammad Dwipa Furqan, Koji Hasebe, Fumio Machida
ICAART (1)2
2024 Counterexamples and amendments to the termination and optimality of ADOPT-based algorithms
abstract
A distributed constraint optimization problem (DCOP) is a framework to model multi-agent coordination problems. Asynchronous distributed optimization (ADOPT) is a well-known complete DCOP algorithm, and many of its variants have been proposed over the last decade. It is considered proven that ADOPT-based algorithms have the key properties of termination and optimality, which guarantee that the algorithms terminate in a finite time and obtain an optimal solution, respectively. In this paper, we present counterexamples to the termination and optimality of ADOPT-based algorithms. They are classified into three types, at least one of which exists in each of ADOPT and eight of its variants that we analyzed. In other words, the algorithms may potentially not terminate or terminate with a suboptimal solution. Furthermore, we show that the bounded-error approximation of ADOPT, which enables the algorithm to terminate faster with the quality of the solution guaranteed within a predefined error bound, also suffers from flaws. Additionally, we propose an amended version of ADOPT that avoids the flaws in existing algorithms and prove that it has the properties of termination and optimality.
Koji Noshiro, Koji Hasebe
Artif. Intell.1
2023 Flaws of Termination and Optimality in ADOPT-based Algorithms
abstract
A distributed constraint optimization problem (DCOP) is a framework to model multi-agent coordination problems. Asynchronous distributed optimization (ADOPT) is a well-known complete DCOP algorithm, and owing to its superior characteristics, many variants have been proposed over the last decade. It is considered proven that ADOPT-based algorithms have the key properties of termination and optimality, which guarantee that the algorithms terminate in a finite time and obtain an optimal solution, respectively. In this paper, we present counterexamples to the termination and optimality of ADOPT-based algorithms. The flaws are classified into three types, at least one of which exists in each of ADOPT and seven of its variants that we analyzed. In other words, the algorithms may potentially not terminate or terminate with a suboptimal solution. We also propose an amended version of ADOPT that avoids the flaws in existing algorithms and prove that it has the properties of termination and optimality.
Koji Noshiro, Koji Hasebe
IJCAI1