Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ferdous Nasri
dblp:354/2812
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-2018-4786ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
pathogen detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Detecting DNA of novel fungal pathogens using ResNets and a curated fungi-hosts data collection · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › machine learning for genomics
genome representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Detecting DNA of novel fungal pathogens using ResNets and a curated fungi-hosts data collection · Bioinform. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequence homology · 0.6resnet · 0.6deep learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Detecting DNA of novel fungal pathogens using ResNets and a curated fungi-hosts data collectionabstractBACKGROUND: Emerging pathogens are a growing threat, but large data collections and approaches for predicting the risk associated with novel agents are limited to bacteria and viruses. Pathogenic fungi, which also pose a constant threat to public health, remain understudied. Relevant data remain comparatively scarce and scattered among many different sources, hindering the development of sequencing-based detection workflows for novel fungal pathogens. No prediction method working for agents across all three groups is available, even though the cause of an infection is often difficult to identify from symptoms alone. RESULTS: We present a curated collection of fungal host range data, comprising records on human, animal and plant pathogens, as well as other plant-associated fungi, linked to publicly available genomes. We show that it can be used to predict the pathogenic potential of novel fungal species directly from DNA sequences with either sequence homology or deep learning. We develop learned, numerical representations of the collected genomes and visualize the landscape of fungal pathogenicity. Finally, we train multi-class models predicting if next-generation sequencing reads originate from novel fungal, bacterial or viral threats. CONCLUSIONS: The neural networks trained using our data collection enable accurate detection of novel fungal pathogens. A curated set of over 1400 genomes with host and pathogenicity metadata supports training of machine-learning models and sequence comparison, not limited to the pathogen detection task. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data, models and code are hosted at https://zenodo.org/record/5846345, https://zenodo.org/record/5711877 and https://gitlab.com/dacs-hpi/deepac. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jakub M. Bartoszewicz, Ferdous Nasri, Melania Nowicka, Bernhard Y. Renard |
Bioinform. | 2 |