Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jingkang Liu

dblp:354/2817 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-1076-0009ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Memory systems · 58% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 42%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Graph data management · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
cache management
1.012026
CEGraph: Cache-Efficient Management for Streaming Graph Processing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Memory systems › cache management
cache replacement
1.012026
CEGraph: Cache-Efficient Management for Streaming Graph Processing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › graph processing accelerator
streaming graph processing
1.012026
CEGraph: Cache-Efficient Management for Streaming Graph Processing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
graph processing accelerator
0.812024
PMGraph: Accelerating Concurrent Graph Queries over Streaming Graphs · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2024
Graph data management › graph processing
streaming graph processing
0.522026
CEGraph: Cache-Efficient Management for Streaming Graph Processing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
PMGraph: Accelerating Concurrent Graph Queries over Streaming Graphs · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2024
Memory systems
memory access latency
0.212024
PMGraph: Accelerating Concurrent Graph Queries over Streaming Graphs · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2024
Memory systems › cache
prefetching
0.212024
PMGraph: Accelerating Concurrent Graph Queries over Streaming Graphs · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vertex importance evaluation · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CEGraph: Cache-Efficient Management for Streaming Graph Processing
abstract
Efficient processing of streaming graphs is crucial to improve system performance. Due to the highly irregular and frequent access to data in streaming graph processing, existing cache management methods are difficult to accurately predict cache behavior, resulting in serious cache misses. To address the issues, we propose CEGraph, an efficient cache management approach for streaming graph processing. Specifically, for graph data, we propose a cache replacement policy based on vertex importance. This policy accurately evaluates the importance of vertices in the incremental processing of streaming graphs from our proposed three factors: the association degree of affected state of a vertex, the path distance of a vertex, and whether a vertex will be updated. Vertices with high importance are identified and kept in the cache to reduce cache thrashing. Experimental results reveal that compared with LRU, DRRIP and Grasp, CEGraph reduces the LLC misses by an average of 22.93% (maximum 34.27%), 20.87% and 11.91%, respectively. Compared with the state-of-the-art cache management method P-OPT, CEGraph reduces the LLC misses by 6.46% on average, therefore demonstrating the effectiveness of CEGraph.
Fubing Mao, Zihan Xie, Longyu Nie, Yu Zhang 0027, Haikun Liu, Xiaofei Liao, Hai Jin 0001, Wei Zhang 0012, Yapu Guo, Jingkang Liu
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.10
2024 PMGraph: Accelerating Concurrent Graph Queries over Streaming Graphs
abstract
There are usually a large number of concurrent graph queries (CGQs) requirements in streaming graphs. However, existing graph processing systems mainly optimize a single graph query in streaming graphs or CGQs in static graphs. They have a large number of redundant computations and expensive memory access overhead, and cannot process CGQs in streaming graphs efficiently. To address these issues, we propose PMGraph , a software-hardware collaborative accelerator for efficient processing of CGQs in streaming graphs. First, PMGraph centers on fine-grained data, selects graph queries that meet the requirements through vertex data, and utilizes the similarity between different graph queries to merge the same vertices they need to process to address the problem of a large amount of repeated access to the same data by different graph queries in CGQs, thereby reducing memory access overhead. Furthermore, it adopts the update strategy that regularizes the processing order of vertices in each graph query according to the order of the vertex dependence chain, consequently effectively reducing redundant computations. Second, we propose a CGQs-oriented scheduling strategy to increase the data overlap when different graph queries are processed, thereby further improving the performance. Finally, PMGraph prefetches the vertex information according to the global active vertex set Frontier of all graph queries, hiding the memory access latency. It also provides prefetching for the same vertices that need to be processed by different graph queries, reducing the memory access overhead. Compared with the state-of-the-art concurrent graph query software systems Kickstarter-C and Tripoline, PMGraph achieves average speedups of 5.57× and 4.58×, respectively. Compared with the state-of-the-art hardware accelerators Minnow, HATS, LCCG, and JetStream, PMGraph achieves the speedup of 3.65×, 3.41×, 1.73×, and 1.38× on average, respectively. Experimental results show that our proposed PMGraph outperforms the state-of-the-art concurrent graph processing systems and hardware accelerators.
Fubing Mao, Yu Zhang 0027, Haikun Liu, Xiaofei Liao, Hai Jin 0001, Wei Zhang 0012, Yufei Wu 0024, Longyu Nie, Yapu Guo, Zihan Jiang 0001, Jingkang Liu
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim.13