EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kaisen Pan
dblp:354/3185
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 65% Coding theory · 22% Mathematical optimization · 13% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
2.1 | 3 | 2024 | Rethinking the symmetry-preserving circuits for constrained variational quantum algorithms · ICLR 2024 QuantumDARTS: Differentiable Quantum Architecture Search for Variational Quantum Algorithms · ICML 2023 QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A Benchmark · ICML 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computing
variational quantum algorithm |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Rethinking the symmetry-preserving circuits for constrained variational quantum algorithms · ICLR 2024 QuantumDARTS: Differentiable Quantum Architecture Search for Variational Quantum Algorithms · ICML 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum architecture search |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | QuantumDARTS: Differentiable Quantum Architecture Search for Variational Quantum Algorithms · ICML 2023 QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A Benchmark · ICML 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computing and quantum information |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | QuantumDARTS: Differentiable Quantum Architecture Search for Variational Quantum Algorithms · ICML 2023 QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A Benchmark · ICML 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking the symmetry-preserving circuits for constrained variational quantum algorithms · ICLR 2024 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › error detection
parity check |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking Parity Check Enhanced Symmetry-Preserving Ansatz · NeurIPS 2024 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum error mitigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking Parity Check Enhanced Symmetry-Preserving Ansatz · NeurIPS 2024 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
variational quantum algorithms |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking Parity Check Enhanced Symmetry-Preserving Ansatz · NeurIPS 2024 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computing
parameterized quantum circuit |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | QuantumDARTS: Differentiable Quantum Architecture Search for Variational Quantum Algorithms · ICML 2023 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computing
quantum circuit |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A Benchmark · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking Parity Check Enhanced Symmetry-Preserving Ansatz · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › assignment problem
quadratic assignment problem |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking Parity Check Enhanced Symmetry-Preserving Ansatz · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational quantum algorithm · 0.8quantum overparameterization theory · 0.8quantum optimal control theory · 0.8parity check · 0.8hamming weight preserving ansatz · 0.8simulated annealing · 0.7reinforcement learning · 0.7gumbel-softmax · 0.7genetic algorithm · 0.7differentiable architecture search · 0.7differentiable algorithm · 0.7brute-force search · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Rethinking the symmetry-preserving circuits for constrained variational quantum algorithmsabstractWith the arrival of the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) have emerged as popular approaches to obtain possible quantum advantage in the relatively near future. In particular, how to effectively incorporate the common symmetries in physical systems as hard constraints in VQAs remains a critical and open question. In this paper, we revisit the Hamming Weight (HW) preserving ansatz and establish the links from ansatz to various symmetries and constraints, which both enlarges the usage of HW preserving ansatz and provides a coherent solution for constrained VQAs. Meanwhile, we utilize the quantum optimal control theory and quantum overparameterization theory to analyze the capability and expressivity of HW preserving ansatz and verify these theoretical results on unitary approximation problem. We conduct detailed numerical experiments on two well-studied symmetry-preserving problems, namely ground state energy estimation and feature selection in machine learning. The superior performance demonstrates the efficiency and supremacy of the proposed HW preserving ansatz on constrained VQAs. Ge Yan 0001, Kaisen Pan, Junchi Yan |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Rethinking Parity Check Enhanced Symmetry-Preserving AnsatzabstractWith the arrival of the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) have emerged to obtain possible quantum advantage. In particular, how to effectively incorporate hard constraints in VQAs remains a critical and open question. In this paper, we manage to combine the Hamming Weight Preserving ansatz with a topological-aware parity check on physical qubits to enforce error mitigation and further hard constraints. We demonstrate the combination significantly outperforms peer VQA methods on both quantum chemistry problems and constrained combinatorial optimization problems e.g. Quadratic Assignment Problem. Intensive experimental results on both simulators and superconducting quantum processors are provided to verify that the combination of HWP ansatz with parity check is among the most promising candidates to demonstrate quantum advantages in the NISQ era to solve more realistic problems. Ge Yan 0001, Mengfei Ran, Ruocheng Wang, Kaisen Pan, Junchi Yan |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | QAS-Bench: Rethinking Quantum Architecture Search and A BenchmarkabstractAutomatic quantum architecture search (QAS) has been widely studied across disciplines with different implications. In this paper, beyond a particular domain, we formulate the QAS problem into two basic (and relatively even ideal) tasks: i) arbitrary quantum circuit (QC) regeneration given a target QC; ii) approximating an arbitrary unitary (oracle). The latter can be connected to the setting of various quantum machine learning tasks and other QAS applications. Based on these two tasks, we generate a public QAS benchmark including 900 random QCs and 400 random unitary matrices which is still missing in the literature. We evaluate six baseline algorithms including brute force search, simulated annealing, genetic algorithm, reinforcement learning, hybrid algorithm, and differentiable algorithm as part of our benchmark. One characteristic of our proposed evaluation protocol on the basic tasks is that it deprives the domain-specific designs and techniques as used in existing QAS literature, making a unified evaluation possible and focusing on the vanilla search methods themselves without coupling with domain prior. In fact, the unitary approximation task could be algorithmically more difficult than the specific problems as it needs to explore the whole matrix space to fit the unitary. While specific tasks often only need to fit a partial observation of the unitary as the objective for search. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Lucky-Lance/QAS-Bench. Kaisen Pan, Ge Yan 0001, Jiaming Shan, Junchi Yan |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | QuantumDARTS: Differentiable Quantum Architecture Search for Variational Quantum AlgorithmsabstractWith the arrival of the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era and the fast development of machine learning, variational quantum algorithms (VQA) including Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and quantum neural network (QNN) have received increasing attention with wide potential applications in foreseeable near future. We study the problem of quantum architecture search (QAS) for VQA to automatically design parameterized quantum circuits (PQC). We devise a differentiable searching algorithm based on Gumbel-Softmax in contrast to peer methods that often require numerous circuit sampling and evaluation. Two versions of our algorithm are provided, namely macro search and micro search, where macro search directly searches for the whole circuit like other literature while the innovative micro search is able to infer the sub-circuit structure from a small-scale and then transfer that to a large-scale problem. We conduct intensive experiments on unweighted Max-Cut, ground state energy estimation, and image classification. The superior performance shows the efficiency and capability of macro search, which requires little prior knowledge. Moreover, the experiments on micro search show the potential of our algorithm for large-scale QAS problems. Ge Yan 0001, Kaisen Pan, Junchi Yan |
ICML | 4 |