Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Louis Jean

dblp:354/3786 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.712023
Blossom: an Anytime Algorithm for Computing Optimal Decision Trees · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
optimal decision tree
0.712023
Blossom: an Anytime Algorithm for Computing Optimal Decision Trees · ICML 2023
Algorithms and data structures
anytime algorithms
0.712023
Blossom: an Anytime Algorithm for Computing Optimal Decision Trees · ICML 2023
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.712023
Blossom: an Anytime Algorithm for Computing Optimal Decision Trees · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic programming · 1.3branch-and-bound · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Blossom: an Anytime Algorithm for Computing Optimal Decision Trees
abstract
We propose a simple algorithm to learn optimal decision trees of bounded depth. This algorithm is essentially an anytime version of the state-of-the-art dynamic programming approach. It has virtually no overhead compared to heuristic methods and is comparable to the best exact methods to prove optimality on most data sets. Experiments show that whereas existing exact methods hardly scale to deep trees, this algorithm learns trees comparable to standard heuristics without computational overhead, and can significantly improve their accuracy when given more computation time, even for deep trees.
Emir Demirovic, Emmanuel Hebrard, Louis Jean
ICML3