Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Youcheng Fu
dblp:354/4556
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
additive models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Tilted Sparse Additive Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Tilted Sparse Additive Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
sparse additive model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Tilted Sparse Additive Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › empirical risk minimization
tilted empirical risk minimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Tilted Sparse Additive Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Tilted Sparse Additive Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Tilted Sparse Additive Models · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tilted empirical risk minimization · 0.7random fourier features · 0.7Prox-SVRG · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Gradient Learning With the Mode-Induced Loss: Consistency Analysis and ApplicationsabstractVariable selection methods aim to select the key covariates related to the response variable for learning problems with high-dimensional data. Typical methods of variable selection are formulated in terms of sparse mean regression with a parametric hypothesis class, such as linear functions or additive functions. Despite rapid progress, the existing methods depend heavily on the chosen parametric function class and are incapable of handling variable selection for problems where the data noise is heavy-tailed or skewed. To circumvent these drawbacks, we propose sparse gradient learning with the mode-induced loss (SGLML) for robust model-free (MF) variable selection. The theoretical analysis is established for SGLML on the upper bound of excess risk and the consistency of variable selection, which guarantees its ability for gradient estimation from the lens of gradient risk and informative variable identification under mild conditions. Experimental analysis on the simulated and real data demonstrates the competitive performance of our method over the previous gradient learning (GL) methods. Hong Chen 0004, Youcheng Fu, Weifu Li, Yicong Zhou, Feng Zheng 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 2 |
| 2023 | Tilted Sparse Additive ModelsabstractAdditive models have been burgeoning in data analysis due to their flexible representation and desirable interpretability. However, most existing approaches are constructed under empirical risk minimization (ERM), and thus perform poorly in situations where average performance is not a suitable criterion for the problems of interest, e.g., data with complex non-Gaussian noise, imbalanced labels or both of them. In this paper, a novel class of sparse additive models is proposed under tilted empirical risk minimization (TERM), which addresses the deficiencies in ERM by imposing tilted impact on individual losses, and is flexibly capable of achieving a variety of learning objectives, e.g., variable selection, robust estimation, imbalanced classification and multiobjective learning. On the theoretical side, a learning theory analysis which is centered around the generalization bound and function approximation error bound (under some specific data distributions) is conducted rigorously. On the practical side, an accelerated optimization algorithm is designed by integrating Prox-SVRG and random Fourier acceleration technique. The empirical assessments verify the competitive performance of our approach on both synthetic and real data. Yingjie Wang 0007, Hong Chen 0004, Weifeng Liu 0001, Fengxiang He, Tieliang Gong, Youcheng Fu, Dacheng Tao |
ICML | 6 |