Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Radowan Mahmud Redoy

dblp:354/6436 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-8014-8023ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 77% Program analysis · 23%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object annotation
3d bounding box annotation
0.912025
LabelAny3D: Label Any Object 3D in the Wild · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection
0.912025
LabelAny3D: Label Any Object 3D in the Wild · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene reconstruction
0.912025
LabelAny3D: Label Any Object 3D in the Wild · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › image-based 3d object detection
monocular 3d object detection
0.912025
LabelAny3D: Label Any Object 3D in the Wild · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
open-vocabulary 3d object detection
0.912025
LabelAny3D: Label Any Object 3D in the Wild · NeurIPS 2025
Systems and software security › software vulnerability
cryptographic API misuse
0.712023
MASC: A Tool for Mutation-Based Evaluation of Static Crypto-API Misuse Detectors · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2023
Software testing
mutation testing
0.712023
MASC: A Tool for Mutation-Based Evaluation of Static Crypto-API Misuse Detectors · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2023
Program analysis
static analysis
0.212023
MASC: A Tool for Mutation-Based Evaluation of Static Crypto-API Misuse Detectors · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mutation scopes · 1.3mutation operators · 1.3foundation model · 0.9analysis-by-synthesis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 LabelAny3D: Label Any Object 3D in the Wild
abstract
Detecting objects in 3D space from monocular input is crucial for applications ranging from robotics to scene understanding. Despite advanced performance in the indoor and autonomous driving domains, existing monocular 3D detection models struggle with in-the-wild images due to the lack of 3D in-the-wild datasets and the challenges of 3D annotation. We introduce LabelAny3D, an analysis-by-synthesis framework that reconstructs holistic 3D scenes from 2D images to efficiently produce high-quality 3D bounding box annotations. Built on this pipeline, we present COCO3D, a new benchmark for open-vocabulary monocular 3D detection, derived from the MS-COCO dataset and covering a wide range of object categories absent from existing 3D datasets. Experiments show that annotations generated by LabelAny3D improve monocular 3D detection performance across multiple benchmarks, outperforming prior auto-labeling approaches in quality. These results demonstrate the promise of foundation-model-driven annotation for scaling up 3D recognition in realistic, open-world settings.
Radowan Mahmud Redoy, Sebastian G. Elbaum, Matthew B. Dwyer, Zezhou Cheng
NeurIPS2
2023 MASC: A Tool for Mutation-Based Evaluation of Static Crypto-API Misuse Detectors
abstract
While software engineers are optimistically adopting crypto-API misuse detectors (or crypto-detectors) in their software development cycles, this momentum must be accompanied by a rigorous understanding of crypto-detectors’ effectiveness at finding crypto-API misuses in practice. This demo paper presents the technical details and usage scenarios of our tool, namely Mutation Analysis for evaluating Static Crypto-API misuse detectors (MASC). We developed 12 generalizable, usage based mutation operators and three mutation scopes, namely Main Scope, Similarity Scope, and Exhaustive Scope, which can be used to expressively instantiate compilable variants of the crypto-API misuse cases. Using MASC, we evaluated nine major crypto-detectors, and discovered 19 unique, undocumented flaws. We designed MASC to be configurable and user-friendly; a user can configure the parameters to change the nature of generated mutations. Furthermore, MASC comes with both Command Line Interface and Web-based front-end, making it practical for users of different levels of expertise.
Amit Seal Ami, Syed Yusuf Ahmed, Radowan Mahmud Redoy, Nathan Cooper, Kaushal Kafle, Kevin Moran, Denys Poshyvanyk, Adwait Nadkarni
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE3