Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hangliang Ding
dblp:354/7332
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 35% Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Language models and text generation · 30% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Video Generation with Sliding Tile Attention · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
efficient attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Video Generation with Sliding Tile Attention · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › efficient attention
sliding window attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Video Generation with Sliding Tile Attention · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion transformer
video diffusion transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Video Generation with Sliding Tile Attention · ICML 2025 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › transformer accelerator
attention acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Video Generation with Sliding Tile Attention · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
LLM agent evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sliding tile attention · 1.7flashattention · 1.7benchmark evaluation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Reshaping 5th Generation Wireless Communications with Gaps in Liquid Crystal Adaptable Infrastructure towards SpaceX Orbital AI Data Centers
Zhengxing Li, Haorong Li, Haolin Zhou, Hangliang Ding, Yunchen Xiao |
IWCMC | 5 |
| 2025 | Fast Video Generation with Sliding Tile AttentionabstractDiffusion Transformers (DiTs) with 3D full attention power state-of-the-art video generation, but suffer from prohibitive compute cost -- when generating just a 5-second 720P video, attention alone takes 800 out of 950 seconds of total inference time. This paper introduces sliding tile attention (STA) to address this challenge. STA leverages the
observation that attention scores in pretrained video diffusion models predominantly concentrate within localized 3D windows. By sliding and attending over local spatial-temporal region, STA eliminates redundancy from full attention. Unlike traditional token-wise sliding window attention (SWA), STA operates tile-by-tile with a novel hardware-aware sliding window design, preserving expressiveness while being \emph{hardware-efficient}. With careful kernel-level optimizations, STA offers the first efficient 2D/3D sliding-window-like attention implementation, achieving 58.79\% MFU -- 7.17× faster than prior art methods. On the leading video DiT model, Hunyuan, it accelerates attention by 1.6–10x over FlashAttention-3, yielding a 1.36–3.53× end-to-end speedup with no or minimum quality loss. Peiyuan Zhang, Runlong Su, Hangliang Ding, Ion Stoica, Zhengzhong Liu 0001, Hao Zhang 0025 |
ICML | 4 |
| 2024 | AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsabstractThe potential of Large Language Model (LLM) as agents has been widely acknowledged recently.
Thus, there is an urgent need to quantitatively evaluate LLMs as agents on challenging tasks in interactive environments.
We present AgentBench, a multi-dimensional benchmark that consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
Our extensive test over 29 API-based and open-sourced (OSS) LLMs shows that, while top commercial LLMs present a strong ability of acting as agents in complex environments, there is a significant disparity in performance between them and many OSS competitors that are no larger than 70B.
We identify the typical reasons of failures in environments and LLMs, showing that poor long-term reasoning, decision-making, and instruction following abilities are the main obstacles for developing usable LLM agents.
Improving instruction following and training on high quality multi-round alignment data could improve agent performance.
And different from existing assumptions, training on code present ambivalent impacts on different agent tasks.
Datasets, environments, and an integrated evaluation package for AgentBench are released at https://github.com/THUDM/AgentBench. Xiao Liu 0036, Hao Yu 0030, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu 0014, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu 0016, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, Shudan Zhang, Xiang Deng 0001, Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Sheng Shen 0001, Tianjun Zhang, Yu Su 0001, Huan Sun 0001, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang 0001 |
ICLR | 8 |