Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Prithwish Dan
dblp:354/8045
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-9916-875XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 70% Motion planning and robot control · 16% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 14% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | One-Shot Imitation Under Mismatched Execution · ICRA 2025 |
Human-robot interaction › human-robot collaboration
collaborative manipulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | InteRACT: Transformer Models for Human Intent Prediction Conditioned on Robot Actions · ICRA 2024 |
Human-robot interaction
intent prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | InteRACT: Transformer Models for Human Intent Prediction Conditioned on Robot Actions · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › manipulation planning
long-horizon manipulation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | One-Shot Imitation Under Mismatched Execution · ICRA 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy training |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | One-Shot Imitation Under Mismatched Execution · ICRA 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
information gathering |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | InteRACT: Transformer Models for Human Intent Prediction Conditioned on Robot Actions · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.5transfer learning · 1.5pre-training and fine-tuning · 1.5sequence-level trajectory pairing · 0.9retrieval and composition · 0.9optimal transport · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | One-Shot Imitation Under Mismatched ExecutionabstractHuman demonstrations as prompts are a power-ful way to program robots to do long-horizon manipulation tasks. However, translating these demonstrations into robot-executable actions presents significant challenges due to execution mismatches in movement styles and physical capabilities. Existing methods for human-robot translation either depend on paired data, which is infeasible to scale, or rely heavily on frame-level visual similarities that often break down in practice. To address these challenges, we propose RHyME, a novel framework that automatically pairs human and robot trajectories using sequence-level optimal transport cost functions. Given long-horizon robot demonstrations, RHyME synthesizes semantically equivalent human videos by retrieving and composing short-horizon human clips. This approach facilitates effective policy training without the need for paired data. RHyME successfully imitates a range of cross-embodiment demonstrators, both in simulation and with a real human hand, achieving over 50% increase in task success compared to previous methods. We release our code and datasets at this website. Kushal Kedia, Prithwish Dan, Angela Chao, Maximus Adrian Pace, Sanjiban Choudhury |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2024 | InteRACT: Transformer Models for Human Intent Prediction Conditioned on Robot ActionsabstractIn collaborative human-robot manipulation, a robot must predict human intents and adapt its actions accordingly to smoothly execute tasks. However, the human’s intent in turn depends on actions the robot takes, creating a chicken-or-egg problem. Prior methods ignore such inter-dependency and instead train marginal intent prediction models independent of robot actions. This is because training conditional models is hard given a lack of paired human-robot interaction datasets.Can we instead leverage large-scale human-human interaction data that is more easily accessible? Our key insight is to exploit a correspondence between human and robot actions that enables transfer learning from human-human to human-robot data. We propose a novel architecture, InteRACT, that pre-trains a conditional intent prediction model on large human-human datasets and fine-tunes on a small human-robot dataset. We evaluate on a set of real-world collaborative human-robot manipulation tasks and show that our conditional model improves over various marginal baselines. We also introduce new techniques to tele-operate a 7-DoF robot arm and collect a diverse range of human-robot collaborative manipulation data which we open-source. We release our code and datasets at https://portal-cornell.github.io/InteRACT/. Kushal Kedia, Atiksh Bhardwaj, Prithwish Dan, Sanjiban Choudhury |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2023 | A Game-Theoretic Framework for Joint Forecasting and PlanningabstractPlanning safe robot motions in the presence of humans requires reliable forecasts of future human motion. However, simply predicting the most likely motion from prior interactions does not guarantee safety. Such forecasts fail to model the long tail of possible events, which are rarely observed in limited datasets. On the other hand, planning for worst-case motions leads to overtly conservative behavior and a “frozen robot”. Instead, we aim to learn forecasts that predict counterfactuals that humans guard against. We propose a novel game-theoretic framework for joint planning and forecasting with the payoff being the performance of the planner against the demonstrator, and present practical algorithms to train models in an end-to-end fashion. We demonstrate that our proposed algorithm results in safer plans in a crowd navigation simulator and real-world datasets of pedestrian motion. We release our code at https://github.com/portal-cornell/Game-Theoretic-Forecasting-Planning. Kushal Kedia, Prithwish Dan, Sanjiban Choudhury |
IROS | 2 |