Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tianchi Xie

dblp:354/8372 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 38% Vision and language · 24% Trustworthy machine learning · 19%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
chart understanding
0.912025
InfoChartQA: A Benchmark for Multimodal Question Answering on Infographic Charts · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data-efficient learning
0.912025
Structural-Entropy-Based Sample Selection for Efficient and Effective Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection
0.912025
Structural-Entropy-Based Sample Selection for Efficient and Effective Learning · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multimodal question answering
0.912025
InfoChartQA: A Benchmark for Multimodal Question Answering on Infographic Charts · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
sample selection
0.912025
Structural-Entropy-Based Sample Selection for Efficient and Effective Learning · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
multimodal large language model evaluation
0.312025
InfoChartQA: A Benchmark for Multimodal Question Answering on Infographic Charts · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual-element-based question design · 0.9structural entropy · 0.9shapley value · 0.9blue noise sampling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Structural-Entropy-Based Sample Selection for Efficient and Effective Learning
abstract
Sample selection improves the efficiency and effectiveness of machine learning models by providing informative and representative samples. Typically, samples can be modeled as a sample graph, where nodes are samples and edges represent their similarities. Most existing methods are based on local information, such as the training difficulty of samples, thereby overlooking global information, such as connectivity patterns. This oversight can result in suboptimal selection because global information is crucial for ensuring that the selected samples well represent the structural properties of the graph. To address this issue, we employ structural entropy to quantify global information and losslessly decompose it from the whole graph to individual nodes using the Shapley value. Based on the decomposition, we present $\textbf{S}$tructural-$\textbf{E}$ntropy-based sample $\textbf{S}$election ($\textbf{SES}$), a method that integrates both global and local information to select informative and representative samples. SES begins by constructing a $k$NN-graph among samples based on their similarities. It then measures sample importance by combining structural entropy (global metric) with training difficulty (local metric). Finally, SES applies importance-biased blue noise sampling to select a set of diverse and representative samples. Comprehensive experiments on three learning scenarios --- supervised learning, active learning, and continual learning --- clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
Tianchi Xie, Jiangning Zhu, Guozu Ma, Minzhi Lin, Wei Chen 0001, Weikai Yang, Shixia Liu
ICLR1
2025 InfoChartQA: A Benchmark for Multimodal Question Answering on Infographic Charts
abstract
Understanding infographic charts with design-driven visual elements (e.g., pictograms, icons) requires both visual recognition and reasoning, posing challenges for multimodal large language models (MLLMs). However, existing visual question answering benchmarks fall short in evaluating these capabilities of MLLMs due to the lack of paired plain charts and visual-element-based questions. To bridge this gap, we introduce InfoChartQA, a benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on infographic chart understanding. It includes 5,642 pairs of infographic and plain charts, each sharing the same underlying data but differing in visual presentations. We further design visual-element-based questions to capture their unique visual designs and communicative intent. Evaluation of 20 MLLMs reveals a substantial performance decline on infographic charts, particularly for visual-element-based questions related to metaphors. The paired infographic and plain charts enable fine-grained error analysis and ablation studies, which highlight new opportunities for advancing MLLMs in infographic chart understanding. We release InfoChartQA at https://github.com/CoolDawnAnt/InfoChartQA.
Tianchi Xie, Minzhi Lin, Mengchen Liu, Changjian Chen, Shixia Liu
NeurIPS1