Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ivan Ermakov
dblp:354/8453
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 94% Language models and text generation · 3% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 3% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational photography and imaging · 75% Image and video processing · 25% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | AutoJudge: Judge Decoding Without Manual Annotation · NeurIPS 2025 Cache Me If You Must: Adaptive Key-Value Quantization for Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoJudge: Judge Decoding Without Manual Annotation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cache Me If You Must: Adaptive Key-Value Quantization for Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
KV cache |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cache Me If You Must: Adaptive Key-Value Quantization for Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
KV cache quantization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cache Me If You Must: Adaptive Key-Value Quantization for Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cache Me If You Must: Adaptive Key-Value Quantization for Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference acceleration
speculative decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AutoJudge: Judge Decoding Without Manual Annotation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational photography and imaging › color constancy
automatic white balance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Image and video processing › color image processing
color correction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Computational photography and imaging
illumination estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Computational photography and imaging › color constancy
white balance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
adaptive quantization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Cache Me If You Must: Adaptive Key-Value Quantization for Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | AutoJudge: Judge Decoding Without Manual Annotation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimation · ICCV 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 1.3neural network · 1.3semi-greedy search · 0.9lightweight classifier · 0.9compact adapters · 0.9adaptive quantization · 0.9LLM embeddings · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Cache Me If You Must: Adaptive Key-Value Quantization for Large Language ModelsabstractEfficient real-world deployments of large language models (LLMs) rely on Key-Value (KV) caching for processing and generating long outputs, reducing the need for repetitive computation. For large contexts, Key-Value caches can take up tens of gigabytes of device memory, as they store vector representations for each token and layer. Recent work has shown that the cached vectors can be compressed through quantization, pruning or merging, but these techniques often compromise quality towards higher compression rates. In this work, we aim to improve Key \& Value compression by exploiting two observations: 1) the inherent dependencies between keys and values across different layers, and 2) the existence of high-compression methods for internal network states (e.g. attention Keys \& Values). We propose AQUA-KV, an adaptive quantization for Key-Value caches that relies on compact adapters to exploit existing dependencies between Keys and Values, and aims to "optimally" compress the information that cannot be predicted. AQUA-KV significantly improves compression rates, while maintaining high accuracy on state-of-the-art LLM families. On Llama 3.2 LLMs, we achieve near-lossless inference at 2-2.5 bits per value with under $1\%$ relative error in perplexity and LongBench scores. AQUA-KV is one-shot, simple, and efficient: it can be calibrated on a single GPU within 1-6 hours, even for 70B models. Alina Shutova, Vladimir Malinovskii, Vage Egiazarian, Denis Kuznedelev, Denis Mazur, Nikita Surkov, Ivan Ermakov, Dan Alistarh |
ICML | 7 |
| 2025 | AutoJudge: Judge Decoding Without Manual AnnotationabstractWe introduce AutoJudge, a method that accelerates large language model (LLM) inference with task-specific lossy speculative decoding.
Instead of matching the original model output distribution token-by-token, we identify the generated tokens that affect the downstream quality of the response, relaxing the distribution match guarantee so that the "unimportant" tokens can be generated faster.
Our approach relies on a semi‑greedy search algorithm to test which of the mismatches between target and draft models should be corrected to preserve quality and which ones may be skipped.
We then train a lightweight classifier based on existing LLM embeddings to predict, at inference time, which mismatching tokens can be safely accepted without compromising the final answer quality.
We evaluate AutoJudge with multiple draft/target model pairs on mathematical reasoning and programming benchmarks, achieving significant speedups at the cost of a minor accuracy reduction.
Notably, on GSM8K with the Llama 3.1 70B target model, our approach achieves up to ${\approx}2{\times}$ speedup \textit{over speculative decoding} at the cost of a ${\le} 1\%$ drop in accuracy.
When applied to the LiveCodeBench benchmark, AutoJudge automatically detects programming-specific important tokens, accepting ${\ge}25$ tokens per speculation cycle at a$~ 2\%$ drop in Pass@1. Our approach requires no human annotation and is easy to integrate with modern LLM inference frameworks. Roman Garipov, Fedor Velikonivtsev, Ivan Ermakov, Ruslan Svirschevski, Vage Egiazarian, Max Ryabinin |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Physically-plausible illumination distribution estimationabstractA camera’s auto-white-balance (AWB) module operates under the assumption that there is a single dominant illumination in a captured scene. AWB methods estimate an image’s dominant illumination and use it as the target "white point" for correction. However, in natural scenes, there are often many light sources present. We performed a user study that revealed that non-dominant illuminations often produce visually pleasing white-balanced images and, in some cases, are even preferred over the dominant illumination. Motivated by this observation, we revisit AWB to predict a distribution of plausible illuminations for use in white balance. As part of this effort, we extend the Cube+ + illumination estimation dataset [12] to provide ground truth illumination distributions per image. Using this new ground truth data, we describe how to train a lightweight neural network method to predict the scene’s illumination distribution. We describe how our idea can be used with existing image formats by embedding the estimated distribution in the RAW image to enable users to generate visually plausible white-balance images. Egor I. Ershov, Vasily Tesalin, Ivan Ermakov, Michael S. Brown |
ICCV | 3 |