EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Seohyeon Cha
dblp:354/8567
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-7080-2217ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 93% Trustworthy machine learning · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | GeFL: Model-Agnostic Federated Learning With Generative Models · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026 NeFL: Nested Model Scaling for Federated Learning With System Heterogeneous Clients · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › heterogeneous federated learning
model-heterogeneous federated learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | GeFL: Model-Agnostic Federated Learning With Generative Models · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › heterogeneous federated learning
device heterogeneity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | NeFL: Nested Model Scaling for Federated Learning With System Heterogeneous Clients · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy leakage |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | GeFL: Model-Agnostic Federated Learning With Generative Models · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
straggler mitigation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | NeFL: Nested Model Scaling for Federated Learning With System Heterogeneous Clients · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
generative model · 1.0feature-level generative modeling · 1.0parameter decoupling · 0.9depthwise and widthwise scaling · 0.9averaging · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | GeFL: Model-Agnostic Federated Learning With Generative ModelsabstractFederated learning (FL) is a distributed training paradigm that enables collaborative learning across clients without sharing local data, thereby preserving privacy. However, the increasing scale and complexity of modern deep models often exceed the computational or memory capabilities of edge devices. Furthermore, clients may be constrained to use heterogeneous model architectures due to hardware variability (e.g., ASICs, FPGAs) or proprietary requirements that prevent the disclosure or modification of local model structures. These practical considerations motivate the need for model-heterogeneous FL, where clients participate using distinct model architectures. In this work, we propose Generative Model-Aided Federated Learning (GeFL), a framework that enables cross-client knowledge sharing via a generative model trained in a federated manner. This generative model captures global data semantics and facilitates local training without requiring model homogeneity across clients. WhileGeFLachieves strong performance, empirical analysis reveals limitations in scalability and potential privacy leakage due to generative sample memorization. To address these concerns, we proposeGeFL-F, which utilizes feature-level generative modeling. This approach enhances scalability to large client populations and mitigates privacy risks. Extensive experiments across image classification tasks demonstrate that bothGeFLandGeFL-Foffer competitive performance in heterogeneous settings. Code is available at [1]. Honggu Kang, Seohyeon Cha, Joonhyuk Kang |
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. | 2 |
| 2025 | NeFL: Nested Model Scaling for Federated Learning With System Heterogeneous ClientsabstractFederated learning (FL) enables distributed training while preserving data privacy, but stragglers—slow or incapable clients can significantly slow down the total training time and degrade performance. To mitigate the impact of stragglers, system heterogeneity, including heterogeneous computing and network bandwidth, has been addressed. While previous studies have addressed system heterogeneity by splitting models into submodels, they offer limited flexibility in model architecture design, without considering potential inconsistencies arising from training multiple submodel architectures. We proposenested federated learning (NeFL), a generalized framework that efficiently divides deep neural networks into submodels using both depthwise and widthwise scaling. To address theinconsistencyarising from training multiple submodel architectures, NeFL decouples a subset of parameters from those being trained for each submodel. An averaging method is proposed to handle these decoupled parameters during aggregation. NeFL enables resource-constrained devices to effectively participate in the FL pipeline, facilitating larger datasets for model training. Experiments demonstrate that NeFL achieves performance gain, especially for the worst-case submodel compared to baseline approaches (7.63% improvement on CIFAR-100). Furthermore, NeFL aligns with recent advances in FL, such as leveraging pre-trained models and accounting for statistical heterogeneity. Honggu Kang, Seohyeon Cha, Jinwoo Shin, Jongmyeong Lee, Joonhyuk Kang |
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. | 2 |