Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rotem Elimelech
dblp:355/2275
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
equation discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unsupervised Discovery of Formulas for Mathematical Constants · NeurIPS 2024 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unsupervised Discovery of Formulas for Mathematical Constants · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pattern identification · 1.5convergence dynamics metrics · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Unsupervised Discovery of Formulas for Mathematical ConstantsabstractOngoing efforts that span over decades show a rise of AI methods for accelerating scientific discovery, yet accelerating discovery in mathematics remains a persistent challenge for AI.
Specifically, AI methods were not effective in creation of formulas for mathematical constants because each such formula must be correct for infinite digits of precision, with 'near-true' formulas providing no insight toward the correct ones. Consequently, formula discovery lacks a clear distance metric needed to guide automated discovery in this realm.
In this work, we propose a systematic methodology for categorization, characterization, and pattern identification of such formulas. The key to our methodology is introducing metrics based on the convergence dynamics of the formulas, rather than on the numerical value of the formula. These metrics enable the first automated clustering of mathematical formulas.
We demonstrate this methodology on Polynomial Continued Fraction formulas, which are ubiquitous in their intrinsic connections to mathematical constants, and generalize many mathematical functions and structures.
We test our methodology on a set of 1,768,900 such formulas, identifying many known formulas for mathematical constants, and discover previously unknown formulas for $\pi$, $\ln(2)$, Gauss', and Lemniscate's constants. The uncovered patterns enable a direct generalization of individual formulas to infinite families, unveiling rich mathematical structures.
This success paves the way towards a generative model that creates formulas fulfilling specified mathematical properties, accelerating the rate of discovery of useful formulas. Michael Shalyt, Uri Seligmann, Itay Beit Halachmi, Ofir David, Rotem Elimelech, Ido Kaminer |
NeurIPS | 5 |