Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bo Dai 0025
dblp:355/2844
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 43% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 38% Video understanding and tracking · 19% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PhyRecon: Physically Plausible Neural Scene Reconstruction · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › implicit neural representation
neural implicit reconstruction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PhyRecon: Physically Plausible Neural Scene Reconstruction · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
differentiable simulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PhyRecon: Physically Plausible Neural Scene Reconstruction · NeurIPS 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | X-VoE: Measuring eXplanatory Violation of Expectation in Physical Events · ICCV 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
intuitive physics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | X-VoE: Measuring eXplanatory Violation of Expectation in Physical Events · ICCV 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
marching cubes · 1.5differentiable rendering · 1.5SDF-based implicit representations · 1.5violation of expectation paradigm · 0.7explanation-based learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A simulation-heuristics dual-process model for intuitive physics
Shiqian Li, Jiajun Yan, Bo Dai 0025, Yujia Peng, Chi Zhang 0017, Yixin Zhu 0001 |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2024 | PhyRecon: Physically Plausible Neural Scene ReconstructionabstractWe address the issue of physical implausibility in multi-view neural reconstruction. While implicit representations have gained popularity in multi-view 3D reconstruction, previous work struggles to yield physically plausible results, limiting their utility in domains requiring rigorous physical accuracy. This lack of plausibility stems from the absence of physics modeling in existing methods and their inability to recover intricate geometrical structures. In this paper, we introduce PHYRECON, the first approach to leverage both differentiable rendering and differentiable physics simulation to learn implicit surface representations. PHYRECON features a novel differentiable particle-based physical simulator built on neural implicit representations. Central to this design is an efficient transformation between SDF-based implicit representations and explicit surface points via our proposed Surface Points Marching Cubes (SP-MC), enabling differentiable learning with both rendering and physical losses. Additionally, PHYRECON models both rendering and physical uncertainty to identify and compensate for inconsistent and inaccurate monocular geometric priors. The physical uncertainty further facilitates physics-guided pixel sampling to enhance the learning of slender structures. By integrating these techniques, our model supports differentiable joint modeling of appearance, geometry, and physics. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PHYRECON significantly improves the reconstruction quality. Our results also exhibit superior physical stability in physical simulators, with at least a 40% improvement across all datasets, paving the way for future physics-based applications. Junfeng Ni, Yixin Chen 0003, Bohan Jing, Bo Dai 0025, Puhao Li, Yixin Zhu 0001, Song-Chun Zhu, Siyuan Huang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2023 | X-VoE: Measuring eXplanatory Violation of Expectation in Physical EventsabstractIntuitive physics is pivotal for human understanding of the physical world, enabling prediction and interpretation of events even in infancy. Nonetheless, replicating this level of intuitive physics in artificial intelligence (AI) remains a formidable challenge. This study introduces X-VoE, a comprehensive benchmark dataset, to assess AI agents’ grasp of intuitive physics. Built on the developmental psychology-rooted Violation of Expectation (VoE) paradigm, X-VoE establishes a higher bar for the explanatory capacities of intuitive physics models. Each VoE scenario within X-VoE encompasses three distinct settings, probing models’ comprehension of events and their underlying explanations. Beyond model evaluation, we present an explanation-based learning system that captures physics dynamics and infers occluded object states solely from visual sequences, without explicit occlusion labels. Experimental outcomes highlight our model’s alignment with human commonsense when tested against X-VoE. A remarkable feature is our model’s ability to visually expound VoE events by reconstructing concealed scenes. Concluding, we discuss the findings’ implications and outline future research directions. Through X-VoE, we catalyze the advancement of AI endowed with human-like intuitive physics capabilities. Bo Dai 0025, Linge Wang, Baoxiong Jia, Zeyu Zhang 0001, Song-Chun Zhu, Chi Zhang 0017, Yixin Zhu 0001 |
ICCV | 1 |