EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaked Almog
dblp:355/6303
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Diagnosis for Post Concept Drift Decision Trees Repair · KR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network repair |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Diagnosis for Post Concept Drift Decision Trees Repair · KR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diagnosis · 0.7decision tree learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Diagnosis for Post Concept Drift Decision Trees RepairabstractDecision trees are commonly used in machine learning since they are accurate and robust classifiers. After a decision tree is built, the data can change over time, causing the classification performance to decrease. This data distribution change is a known challenge in machine learning, referred to as concept drift. Once a concept drift has been detected, usually by experiencing a decrease in the model's performance, it can be handled by training a new model. However, this method does not explain the drift harming the performance but only handles the drift's effects. The main contribution of this paper presents a novel two-step approach called APPETITE, which applies diagnosis techniques to identify the feature that has drifted and then adjusts the model accordingly. For the diagnosis step, we present two algorithms. We experimented on 73 known datasets from the literature and semi-synthesized drifts in their features. Both algorithms are better at handling concept drift than training a new model based on the samples after the drift. Combining the two algorithms can provide an explanation of the drift and is a competitive model against a new model trained on the entire data from before and after the drift. Shaked Almog, Meir Kalech |
KR | 1 |