EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Khalil Virji
dblp:356/0954
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 48% Robot navigation and mapping · 32% Reinforcement learning · 16% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-aware hybrid paradigm of nonlinear MPC and model-based RL for offroad navigation: Exploration of transformers in the predictive model · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-aware hybrid paradigm of nonlinear MPC and model-based RL for offroad navigation: Exploration of transformers in the predictive model · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation
navigation planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-aware hybrid paradigm of nonlinear MPC and model-based RL for offroad navigation: Exploration of transformers in the predictive model · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
nonlinear model predictive control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-aware hybrid paradigm of nonlinear MPC and model-based RL for offroad navigation: Exploration of transformers in the predictive model · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation
off-road navigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-aware hybrid paradigm of nonlinear MPC and model-based RL for offroad navigation: Exploration of transformers in the predictive model · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-aware hybrid paradigm of nonlinear MPC and model-based RL for offroad navigation: Exploration of transformers in the predictive model · ICRA 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-aware hybrid paradigm of nonlinear MPC and model-based RL for offroad navigation: Exploration of transformers in the predictive model · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.8mutual information · 0.8ensemble model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Uncertainty-aware hybrid paradigm of nonlinear MPC and model-based RL for offroad navigation: Exploration of transformers in the predictive modelabstractIn this paper, we investigate a hybrid scheme that combines nonlinear model predictive control (MPC) and model-based reinforcement learning (RL) for navigation planning of an autonomous model car across offroad, unstructured terrains without relying on predefined maps. Our innovative approach takes inspiration from BADGR, an LSTM-based network that primarily concentrates on environment modeling, but distinguishes itself by substituting LSTM modules with transformers to greatly elevate the performance of our model. Addressing uncertainty within the system, we train an ensemble of predictive models and estimate the mutual information between model weights and outputs, facilitating dynamic horizon planning through the introduction of variable speeds. Further enhancing our methodology, we incorporate a nonlinear MPC controller that accounts for the intricacies of the vehicle’s model and states. The model-based RL facet produces steering angles and quantifies inherent uncertainty. At the same time, the nonlinear MPC suggests optimal throttle settings, striking a balance between goal attainment speed and managing model uncertainty influenced by velocity. In the conducted studies, our approach excels over the existing baseline by consistently achieving higher metric values in predicting future events and seamlessly integrating the vehicle’s kinematic model for enhanced decision-making. The code and the evaluation data are available at (Github-repo). Faraz Lotfi, Khalil Virji, Farnoosh Faraji, Lucas Berry, Andrew Holliday, David Meger, Gregory Dudek |
ICRA | 2 |