Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maxence Mohamed Elfatihi
dblp:356/2827
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 82% Optimization for machine learning · 14% Deep learning architectures and training · 4% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Non-rectangular Robust MDPs with Normed Uncertainty Sets · NeurIPS 2025 Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › robust reinforcement learning
robust markov decision process |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Non-rectangular Robust MDPs with Normed Uncertainty Sets · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy evaluation
robust policy evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Non-rectangular Robust MDPs with Normed Uncertainty Sets · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lp uncertainty set · 0.9dual formulation · 0.9policy gradient · 0.8frequency regularization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Non-rectangular Robust MDPs with Normed Uncertainty SetsabstractRobust policy evaluation for non-rectangular uncertainty set is generally NP-hard, even in approximation. Consequently, existing approaches suffer from either exponential iteration complexity or significant accuracy gaps. Interestingly, we identify a powerful class of $L_p$-bounded uncertainty sets that avoid these complexity barriers due to their structural simplicity. We further show that this class can be decomposed into infinitely many \texttt{sa}-rectangular $L_p$-bounded sets and leverage its structural properties to derive a novel dual formulation for $L_p$ robust Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). This formulation reveals key insights into the adversary’s strategy and leads to the \textbf{first polynomial-time robust policy evaluation algorithm} for $L_1$-normed non-rectangular robust MDPs. Navdeep Kumar, Adarsh Gupta, Maxence Mohamed Elfatihi, Giorgia Ramponi, Kfir Y. Levy, Shie Mannor |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency RegularizationabstractIn robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), it is assumed that the reward and the transition dynamics lie in a given uncertainty set. By targeting maximal return under the most adversarial model from that set, RMDPs address performance sensitivity to misspecified environments. Yet, to preserve computational tractability, the uncertainty set is traditionally independently structured for each state. This so-called rectangularity condition is solely motivated by computational concerns. As a result, it lacks a practical incentive and may lead to overly conservative behavior. In this work, we study coupled reward RMDPs where the transition kernel is fixed, but the reward function lies within an alpha-radius from a nominal one. We draw a direct connection between this type of non-rectangular reward-RMDPs and applying policy visitation frequency regularization. We introduce a policy-gradient method, and prove its convergence. Numerical experiments illustrate the learned policy's robustness and its less conservative behavior when compared to rectangular uncertainty. Uri Gadot, Esther Derman, Navdeep Kumar, Maxence Mohamed Elfatihi, Kfir Y. Levy, Shie Mannor |
AAAI | 4 |