Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maxence Mohamed Elfatihi

dblp:356/2827 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 82% Optimization for machine learning · 14% Deep learning architectures and training · 4%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning
1.622025
Non-rectangular Robust MDPs with Normed Uncertainty Sets · NeurIPS 2025
Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › robust reinforcement learning
robust markov decision process
0.912025
Non-rectangular Robust MDPs with Normed Uncertainty Sets · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy evaluation
robust policy evaluation
0.912025
Non-rectangular Robust MDPs with Normed Uncertainty Sets · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.812024
Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.812024
Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.212024
Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.212024
Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lp uncertainty set · 0.9dual formulation · 0.9policy gradient · 0.8frequency regularization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Non-rectangular Robust MDPs with Normed Uncertainty Sets
abstract
Robust policy evaluation for non-rectangular uncertainty set is generally NP-hard, even in approximation. Consequently, existing approaches suffer from either exponential iteration complexity or significant accuracy gaps. Interestingly, we identify a powerful class of $L_p$-bounded uncertainty sets that avoid these complexity barriers due to their structural simplicity. We further show that this class can be decomposed into infinitely many \texttt{sa}-rectangular $L_p$-bounded sets and leverage its structural properties to derive a novel dual formulation for $L_p$ robust Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). This formulation reveals key insights into the adversary’s strategy and leads to the \textbf{first polynomial-time robust policy evaluation algorithm} for $L_1$-normed non-rectangular robust MDPs.
Navdeep Kumar, Adarsh Gupta, Maxence Mohamed Elfatihi, Giorgia Ramponi, Kfir Y. Levy, Shie Mannor
NeurIPS3
2024 Solving Non-rectangular Reward-Robust MDPs via Frequency Regularization
abstract
In robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), it is assumed that the reward and the transition dynamics lie in a given uncertainty set. By targeting maximal return under the most adversarial model from that set, RMDPs address performance sensitivity to misspecified environments. Yet, to preserve computational tractability, the uncertainty set is traditionally independently structured for each state. This so-called rectangularity condition is solely motivated by computational concerns. As a result, it lacks a practical incentive and may lead to overly conservative behavior. In this work, we study coupled reward RMDPs where the transition kernel is fixed, but the reward function lies within an alpha-radius from a nominal one. We draw a direct connection between this type of non-rectangular reward-RMDPs and applying policy visitation frequency regularization. We introduce a policy-gradient method, and prove its convergence. Numerical experiments illustrate the learned policy's robustness and its less conservative behavior when compared to rectangular uncertainty.
Uri Gadot, Esther Derman, Navdeep Kumar, Maxence Mohamed Elfatihi, Kfir Y. Levy, Shie Mannor
AAAI4