Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pascal Winkler
dblp:356/3690
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-8324-4993ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 67% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 33% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
smart contract security |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Software testing
fuzzing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Software testing › fuzzing
smart contract fuzzing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart Contracts · CCS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fuzzing · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $2B Lessons: Brigade as a Defense Against Real-World DeFi Bridge Exploits
Pascal Winkler, Jens-Rene Giesen, Oussama Draissi, Federico Badaloni, Sebastian Holler, Clara Schneidewind, Lucas Davi |
ACNS (2) | 1 |
| 2023 | Fuzz on the Beach: Fuzzing Solana Smart ContractsabstractSolana has quickly emerged as a popular platform for building decentralized applications (DApps), such as marketplaces for non-fungible tokens (NFTs). A key reason for its success are Solana's low transaction fees and high performance, which is achieved in part due to its stateless programming model. Although the literature features extensive tooling support for smart contract security, current solutions are largely tailored for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. Unfortunately, the very stateless nature of Solana's execution environment introduces novel attack patterns specific to Solana requiring a rethinking for building vulnerability analysis methods. Sven Smolka, Jens-Rene Giesen, Pascal Winkler, Oussama Draissi, Lucas Davi, Ghassan Karame, Klaus Pohl |
CCS | 3 |