Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haojie Lei

dblp:356/5109 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0002-9160-8670ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable reinforcement learning
0.712023
Differentiable Logic Policy for Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Study From an Optimization Perspective · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic programming
inductive logic programming
0.712023
Differentiable Logic Policy for Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Study From an Optimization Perspective · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy mirror descent
0.712023
Differentiable Logic Policy for Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Study From an Optimization Perspective · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.712023
Differentiable Logic Policy for Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Study From an Optimization Perspective · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mirror descent · 0.7function approximation · 0.7constrained policy optimization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Differentiable Logic Policy for Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Study From an Optimization Perspective
abstract
The interpretability of policies remains an important challenge in Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL). This paper explores interpretable DRL via representing policy by Differentiable Inductive Logic Programming (DILP) and provides a theoretical and empirical study of DILP-based policy learning from an optimization perspective. We first identified a fundamental fact that DILP-based policy learning should be solved as a constrained policy optimization problem. We then proposed to use Mirror Descent for policy optimization (MDPO) to deal with the constraints of DILP-based policies. We derived the closed-form regret bound of MDPO with function approximation, which is helpful to the design of DRL frameworks. Moreover, we studied the convexity of DILP-based policy to further verify the benefits gained from MDPO. Empirically, we experimented MDPO, its on-policy variant, and 3 mainstream policy learning methods, and the results verified our theoretical analysis.
Xin Li 0033, Haojie Lei, Li Zhang 0144, Mingzhong Wang
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2