EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chunkai Fu
dblp:356/5506
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 61% Computational geometry · 30% Approximation and online algorithms · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational geometry › spatial data structures
kd-tree |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning-Augmented Search Data Structures · ICLR 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design
search structures |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning-Augmented Search Data Structures · ICLR 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures
skip list |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning-Augmented Search Data Structures · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
oracle predictions · 0.9machine learning advice · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning-Augmented Search Data StructuresabstractWe study the integration of machine learning advice to improve upon traditional data structure designed for efficient search queries. Although there has been recent effort in improving the performance of binary search trees using machine learning advice, e.g., Lin et. al. (ICML 2022), the resulting constructions nevertheless suffer from inherent weaknesses of binary search trees, such as complexity of maintaining balance across multiple updates and the inability to handle partially-ordered or high-dimensional datasets. For these reasons, we focus on skip lists and KD trees in this work. Given access to a possibly erroneous oracle that outputs estimated fractional frequencies for search queries on a set of items, we construct skip lists and KD trees that provably provides the optimal expected search time, within nearly a factor of two. In fact, our learning-augmented skip lists and KD trees are still optimal up to a constant factor, even if the oracle is only accurate within a constant factor. We also demonstrate robustness by showing that our data structures achieves an expected search time that is within a constant factor of an oblivious skip list/KD tree construction even when the predictions are arbitrarily incorrect. Finally, we empirically show that our learning-augmented search data structures outperforms their corresponding traditional analogs on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Chunkai Fu, Brandon G. Nguyen, Jung Hoon Seo, Ryan S. Zesch, Samson Zhou |
ICLR | 1 |