Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marshall A Case
dblp:356/6256
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › high-throughput sequencing data analysis
deep sequencing data analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix scores predict antibody variant properties from deep sequencing data · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein engineering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix scores predict antibody variant properties from deep sequencing data · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix scores predict antibody variant properties from deep sequencing data · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
position-specific enrichment ratio matrix · 0.7enrichment ratio scoring · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix scores predict antibody variant properties from deep sequencing dataabstractMOTIVATION: Deep sequencing of antibody and related protein libraries after phage or yeast-surface display sorting is widely used to identify variants with increased affinity, specificity, and/or improvements in key biophysical properties. Conventional approaches for identifying optimal variants typically use the frequencies of observation in enriched libraries or the corresponding enrichment ratios. However, these approaches disregard the vast majority of deep sequencing data and often fail to identify the best variants in the libraries. RESULTS: Here, we present a method, Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix (PSERM) scoring, that uses entire deep sequencing datasets from pre- and post-selections to score each observed protein variant. The PSERM scores are the sum of the site-specific enrichment ratios observed at each mutated position. We find that PSERM scores are much more reproducible and correlate more strongly with experimentally measured properties than frequencies or enrichment ratios, including for multiple antibody properties (affinity and non-specific binding) for a clinical-stage antibody (emibetuzumab). We expect that this method will be broadly applicable to diverse protein engineering campaigns. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All deep sequencing datasets and code to perform the analyses presented within are available via https://github.com/Tessier-Lab-UMich/PSERM_paper. Matthew D. Smith 0004, Marshall A Case, Emily K. Makowski, Peter M. Tessier |
Bioinform. | 2 |