Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dylan Zhang

dblp:356/7242 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 34% Optimization for machine learning · 17% Face, body and person analysis · 15%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization
0.912025
ScaleBiO: Scalable Bilevel Optimization for LLM Data Reweighting · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data reweighting
0.912025
ScaleBiO: Scalable Bilevel Optimization for LLM Data Reweighting · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data selection for fine-tuning
0.912025
The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fit · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
emotion recognition
0.812024
Visual Prompting in LLMs for Enhancing Emotion Recognition · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial expression analysis
facial expression recognition
0.812024
Visual Prompting in LLMs for Enhancing Emotion Recognition · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning
0.312025
The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fit · NeurIPS 2025
Learning and educational technologies
visual prompts
0.212024
Visual Prompting in LLMs for Enhancing Emotion Recognition · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

set-of-vision prompting · 1.5facial landmarks · 1.5bounding boxes · 1.5response selection by normalized probability · 0.9data reweighting · 0.9bi-level optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ScaleBiO: Scalable Bilevel Optimization for LLM Data Reweighting
abstract
Rui Pan, Dylan Zhang, Hanning Zhang, Xingyuan Pan, Minrui Xu, Jipeng Zhang, Renjie Pi, Xiaoyu Wang, Tong Zhang. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Rui Pan 0002, Dylan Zhang, Hanning Zhang, Xingyuan Pan, Minrui Xu, Renjie Pi, Xiaoyu Wang 0008, Tong Zhang 0001
ACL (1)2
2025 The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fit
abstract
High-quality supervised finetuning (SFT) data are essential for unlocking pretrained LLMs’ capabilities. Typically, instructions are paired with responses from various sources—by human annotators or other LMs—which are often out of the distribution of the target model to be finetuned. At scale, this mismatch can lead to diminishing returns and even hurt model performance and robustness. We hypothesize that SFT is most effective when the data is aligned with the model’s pretrained distribution, and propose **GRAPE**—a novel SFT framework that tailors supervision to the target model. For each instruction, it **g**athers **r**esponses from various sources and selects the one that **a**ligns most closely to the model’s **pre**trained distribution, as measured by the normalized probability. Standard SFT is then performed on these selected responses. We first evaluate GRAPE in a controlled experiment, sampling multiple responses per question in the UltraInteract dataset from diverse models. We finetune using GRAPE-selected data on LMs from different families, including LLaMA-1-8B, Mistral-7B, and Qwen2.5-7B. GRAPE significantly outperforms strong baselines—including distilling from the strongest model—with absolute gains up to **13.8%** averaged across benchmarks, and outperforms a 3× larger data baseline with improvements up to **17.3%**. GRAPE's benefits generalize to off-the-shelf SFT data. When used to subsample from the post-training data of Tulu3 and Olmo-2, GRAPE surpasses strong baselines trained on 4.5× more data by **6.1%**, and outperforms state-of-the-art selection methods by **3.9%** on average. Notably, with only **1/3 the data** and **half the training epochs**, GRAPE enables LLaMA-1-8B to **exceed Tulu3-SFT performance by 3.5%**. Our findings highlight that aligning supervision with the pretrained distribution provides a simple yet powerful strategy to improve both the **efficiency** and **effectiveness** of SFT.
Dylan Zhang, Qirun Dai 0002
NeurIPS1
2024 Visual Prompting in LLMs for Enhancing Emotion Recognition
abstract
Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) are transforming the intersection of computer vision and natural language processing.Nonetheless, the potential of using visual prompts for emotion recognition in these models remains largely unexplored and untapped.Traditional methods in VLLMs struggle with spatial localization and often discard valuable global context.To address this problem, we propose a Set-of-Vision prompting (SoV) approach that enhances zero-shot emotion recognition by using spatial information, such as bounding boxes and facial landmarks, to mark targets precisely.SoV improves accuracy in face count and emotion categorization while preserving the enriched image context.Through a battery of experimentation and analysis of recent commercial or open-source VLLMs, we evaluate the SoV model's ability to comprehend facial expressions in natural environments.Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating spatial visual prompts into VLLMs for improving emotion recognition performance. Question:How many visible faces are there in the image?Analyze each face's emotion and group the face's emotions. Answer:In the image, there are 22 visible faces.Emotions can be grouped into three main categories. Neutral Emotion: Approximately 16Faces.This neutral expression is typical in settings requiring attention to a speaker or event, reflecting an engaged yet reserved emotional state. Mildly Positive Emotion: Approximately 5Faces.This could be a response to something interesting or mildly amusing happening at the event, but their reactions are subdued, in keeping with the formal setting.Happy: 1 Face.This expression stands out as more joyful or enthusiastic about the proceedings.
Qixuan Zhang, Zhifeng Wang 0004, Dylan Zhang, Wenjia Niu, Sabrina B. Caldwell, Tom Gedeon, Yang Liu 0003, Zhenyue Qin
EMNLP3