Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jayjun Lee

dblp:356/8918 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 32% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16% Trustworthy machine learning · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › plan execution
failure recovery
0.912025
RACER: Rich Language-Guided Failure Recovery Policies for Imitation Learning · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.912025
RACER: Rich Language-Guided Failure Recovery Policies for Imitation Learning · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning › manipulation learning
language-conditioned manipulation
0.912025
RACER: Rich Language-Guided Failure Recovery Policies for Imitation Learning · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.912025
RACER: Rich Language-Guided Failure Recovery Policies for Imitation Learning · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference under Ambiguities · ICLR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.912025
Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference under Ambiguities · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
multilingual evaluation
0.312025
Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference under Ambiguities · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 1.7supervisor-actor framework · 0.9evaluation protocol · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference under Ambiguities
abstract
Spatial expressions in situated communication can be ambiguous, as their meanings vary depending on the frames of reference (FoR) adopted by speakers and listeners. While spatial language understanding and reasoning by vision-language models (VLMs) have gained increasing attention, potential ambiguities in these models are still under-explored. To address this issue, we present the COnsistent Multilingual Frame Of Reference Test (COMFORT), an evaluation protocol to systematically assess the spatial reasoning capabilities of VLMs. We evaluate nine state-of-the-art VLMs using COMFORT. Despite showing some alignment with English conventions in resolving ambiguities, our experiments reveal significant shortcomings of VLMs: notably, the models (1) exhibit poor robustness and consistency, (2) lack the flexibility to accommodate multiple FoRs, and (3) fail to adhere to language-specific or culture-specific conventions in cross-lingual tests, as English tends to dominate other languages. With a growing effort to align vision-language models with human cognitive intuitions, we call for more attention to the ambiguous nature and cross-cultural diversity of spatial reasoning.
Fengyuan Hu, Jayjun Lee, Freda Shi, Parisa Kordjamshidi, Joyce Y. Chai, Ziqiao Ma 0001
ICLR3
2025 RACER: Rich Language-Guided Failure Recovery Policies for Imitation Learning
abstract
Developing robust and correctable visuomotor policies for robotic manipulation is challenging due to the lack of self-recovery mechanisms from failures and the limitations of simple language instructions in guiding robot actions. To address these issues, we propose a scalable data generation pipeline that automatically augments expert demonstrations with failure recovery trajectories and fine-grained language annotations for training. We then introduce Rich languAge-guided failure reCovERy (RACER), a supervisor-actor frame-work, which combines failure recovery data with rich language descriptions to enhance robot control. RACER features a vision-language model (VLM) that acts as an online supervisor, providing detailed language guidance for error correction and task execution, and a language-conditioned visuomotor policy as an actor to predict the next actions. Our experimental results show that RACER outperforms the state-of-the-art Robotic View Transformer (RVT) on RLbench across various evaluation settings, including standard long-horizon tasks, dynamic goal-change tasks and zero-shot unseen tasks, achieving superior performance in both simulated and real world environments. Videos and code are available at: https://rich-language-failure-recovery.github.io.
Yinpei Dai, Jayjun Lee, Nima Fazeli, Joyce Y. Chai
ICRA2