Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bishnu Bhusal
dblp:356/9320
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7522-5878ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Approximate Algorithms for Verifying Differential Privacy with Gaussian Distributions · CCS 2025 Deciding Differential Privacy of Online Algorithms with Multiple Variables · CCS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy auditing
verification of differential privacy |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Approximate Algorithms for Verifying Differential Privacy with Gaussian Distributions · CCS 2025 Deciding Differential Privacy of Online Algorithms with Multiple Variables · CCS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Privacy Preserving In-Context-Learning Framework for Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
privacy-preserving in-context learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Privacy Preserving In-Context-Learning Framework for Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › synthetic data generation
differentially private text generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Privacy Preserving In-Context-Learning Framework for Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Privacy Preserving In-Context-Learning Framework for Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy mechanism design
gaussian mechanism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Approximate Algorithms for Verifying Differential Privacy with Gaussian Distributions · CCS 2025 |
Program verification › probabilistic verification
probabilistic program verification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Approximate Algorithms for Verifying Differential Privacy with Gaussian Distributions · CCS 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
decision procedures |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Checking δ-Satisfiability of Reals with Integrals · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability modulo theories
real arithmetic |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Checking δ-Satisfiability of Reals with Integrals · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic text generation · 2.0differential privacy · 2.0δ-decision procedures · 1.7tail probability bound · 1.7interval arithmetic · 1.7integral approximation · 1.7automata theory · 1.3PSPACE complexity analysis · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Privacy Preserving In-Context-Learning Framework for Large Language ModelsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have significantly transformed natural language understanding and generation, but they raise privacy concerns due to potential exposure of sensitive information. Studies have highlighted the risk of information leakage, where adversaries can extract sensitive information embedded in the prompts. In this work, we introduce a novel private prediction framework for generating high-quality synthetic text with strong privacy guarantees. Our approach leverages the Differential Privacy (DP) framework to ensure worst-case theoretical bounds on information leakage without requiring any fine-tuning of the underlying models. The proposed method performs inference on private records and aggregates the resulting per-token output distributions. This enables the generation of longer and coherent synthetic text while maintaining privacy guarantees. Additionally, we propose a simple blending operation that combines private and public inference to further enhance utility. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods on in-context-learning (ICL) tasks, making it a promising direction for privacy-preserving text generation while maintaining high utility. Bishnu Bhusal, Manoj Acharya, Ramneet Kaur, Colin Samplawski, Adam D. Cobb, Rohit Chadha, Susmit Jha |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Approximate Algorithms for Verifying Differential Privacy with Gaussian DistributionsabstractThe verification of differential privacy algorithms that employ Gaussian distributions is little understood. This paper tackles the challenge of verifying such programs by introducing a novel approach to approximating probability distributions of loop-free programs that sample from both discrete and continuous distributions with computable probability density functions, including Gaussian and Laplace. We establish that verifying $(ε,δ)$-differential privacy for these programs is \emph{almost decidable}, meaning the problem is decidable for all values of $δ$ except those in a finite set. Our verification algorithm is based on computing probabilities to any desired precision by combining integral approximations, and tail probability bounds. The proposed methods are implemented in the tool, DipApprox, using the FLINT library for high-precision integral computations, and incorporate optimizations to enhance scalability. We validate {\ourtool} on fundamental privacy-preserving algorithms, such as Gaussian variants of the Sparse Vector Technique and Noisy Max, demonstrating its effectiveness in both confirming privacy guarantees and detecting violations. Bishnu Bhusal, Rohit Chadha, A. Prasad Sistla, Mahesh Viswanathan 0001 |
CCS | 1 |
| 2025 | Checking δ-Satisfiability of Reals with IntegralsabstractMany synthesis and verification problems can be reduced to determining the truth of formulas over the real numbers. These formulas often involve constraints with integrals in them. To this end, we extend the framework of δ -decision procedures with techniques for handling integrals of user-specified real functions. We implement this decision procedure in the tool ∫dReal, which is built on top of dReal. We evaluate ∫dReal on a suite of problems that include formulas verifying the fairness of algorithms and the privacy and the utility of privacy mechanisms and formulas that synthesize parameters for the desired utility of privacy mechanisms. The performance of the tool in these experiments demonstrates the effectiveness of ∫dReal. Cody Rivera, Bishnu Bhusal, Rohit Chadha, A. Prasad Sistla, Mahesh Viswanathan 0001 |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 2 |
| 2024 | Formal Verification for Blockchain-based Insurance Claims ProcessingabstractInsurance claims processing involves multi-domain entities and multi-source data, along with a number of human-agent interactions. Use of Blockchain technology-based platform can significantly improve scalability and response time for processing of claims which are otherwise manually-intensive and time-consuming. However, the chaincodes involved within the processes that issue claims, approve or deny them as required, need to be formally verified to ensure secure and reliable processing of transactions in Blockchain. In this paper, we use a formal modeling approach to verify various processes and their underlying chaincodes relating to different stages in insurance claims processing viz., issuance, approval, denial, and flagging for fraud investigation by using linear temporal logic (LTL). We simulate the formalism on the chaincodes and analyze the breach of chaincodes via model checking. Roshan Neupane, Ernest Bonnah, Bishnu Bhusal, Kiran Neupane, Khaza Anuarul Hoque, Prasad Calyam |
NOMS | 3 |
| 2023 | Deciding Differential Privacy of Online Algorithms with Multiple VariablesabstractWe consider the problem of checking the differential privacy of online randomized algorithms that process a stream of inputs and produce outputs corresponding to each input. This paper generalizes an automaton model called DiP automata [10] to describe such algorithms by allowing multiple real-valued storage variables. A DiP automaton is a parametric automaton whose behavior depends on the privacy budget ∈. An automaton A will be said to be differentially private if, for some D, the automaton is D∈-differentially private for all values of ∈ > 0. We identify a precise characterization of the class of all differentially private DiP automata. We show that the problem of determining if a given DiP automaton belongs to this class is PSPACE-complete. Our PSPACE algorithm also computes a value for D when the given automaton is differentially private. The algorithm has been implemented, and experiments demonstrating its effectiveness are presented. Rohit Chadha, A. Prasad Sistla, Mahesh Viswanathan 0001, Bishnu Bhusal |
CCS | 4 |