Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul Höft

dblp:356/9875 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5883-3107ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
classical planning
1.622025
Representing Perfect Saturated Cost Partitioning Heuristics in Classical Planning · KR 2025
Versatile Cost Partitioning with Exact Sensitivity Analysis · ICAPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search › planning heuristics
cost partitioning
1.622025
Representing Perfect Saturated Cost Partitioning Heuristics in Classical Planning · KR 2025
Versatile Cost Partitioning with Exact Sensitivity Analysis · ICAPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.912025
Representing Perfect Saturated Cost Partitioning Heuristics in Classical Planning · KR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
admissible heuristics
0.812024
Versatile Cost Partitioning with Exact Sensitivity Analysis · ICAPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › plan optimization
optimal planning
0.812024
Versatile Cost Partitioning with Exact Sensitivity Analysis · ICAPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensitivity analysis · 0.8linear programming · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Representing Perfect Saturated Cost Partitioning Heuristics in Classical Planning
abstract
Saturated cost partitioning (SCP) is one of the strongest methods for admissibly combining heuristics for optimal classical planning. The quality of an SCP heuristic depends heavily on the order in which its component heuristics are considered. For high accuracy, it is essential to maximize over multiple SCP heuristics computed using different component orders. However, for n component heuristics, even enumerating all n! orders is usually infeasible. Consequently, previous work resorted to using greedy algorithms and local optimization. In contrast, we present the first practical method for computing the perfect SCP heuristic that is equivalent to considering all component orders. We show that a set of SCP heuristics forms an additive disjunctive heuristic, which allows us to concisely represent component orders as a directed acyclic graph. Furthermore, once certain components have been considered, the order of the remaining components often becomes irrelevant. By exploiting this characteristic, we can reduce the size of the heuristic representation by several orders of magnitude in practice. Finally, our work makes it possible to compare the quality of existing SCP methods with that of the perfect SCP heuristic, revealing that existing approximations are nearly optimal for standard benchmarks.
Paul Höft, David Speck 0001, Jendrik Seipp
KR1
2024 Versatile Cost Partitioning with Exact Sensitivity Analysis
abstract
Saturated post-hoc optimization is a powerful method for computing admissible heuristics for optimal classical planning. The approach solves a linear program (LP) for each state encountered during the search, which is computationally demanding. In this paper, we theoretically and empirically analyze to which extent we can reuse an LP solution of one state for another. We introduce a novel sensitivity analysis that can exactly characterize the set of states for which a unique LP solution is optimal. Furthermore, we identify two properties of the underlying LPs that affect reusability. Finally, we introduce an algorithm that optimizes LP solutions to generalize well to other states. Our new algorithms significantly reduce the number of necessary LP computations.
Paul Höft, David Speck 0001, Florian Pommerening, Jendrik Seipp
ICAPS1
2023 Sensitivity Analysis for Saturated Post-Hoc Optimization in Classical Planning
abstract
Cost partitioning is the foundation of today’s strongest heuristics for optimal classical planning. However, computing a cost partitioning for each evaluated state is prohibitively expensive in practice. Thus, existing approaches make an approximation and compute a cost partitioning only for a set of sampled states, and then reuse the resulting heuristics for all other states evaluated during the search. In this paper, we present exact methods for cost partitioning heuristics based on linear programming that fully preserve heuristic accuracy while minimizing computational cost. Specifically, we focus on saturated post-hoc optimization and establish several sufficient conditions for when reusing a cost partitioning computed for one state preserves the estimates for other states, mainly based on a sensitivity analysis of the underlying linear program. Our experiments demonstrate that our theoretical results transfer into practice, and that our exact cost partitioning algorithms are competitive with the strongest approximations currently available, while usually requiring fewer linear program evaluations.
Paul Höft, David Speck 0001, Jendrik Seipp
ECAI1