Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timo Martens

dblp:357/1055 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5284-9813ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% 3D vision · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Compressing tree ensembles through Level-wise Optimization and Pruning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Compressing tree ensembles through Level-wise Optimization and Pruning · ICML 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
model verification
0.912025
Compressing tree ensembles through Level-wise Optimization and Pruning · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pruning · 0.9level-wise optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning from biased positive-unlabeled data via threshold calibration
abstract
Learning from positive and unlabeled data (PU learning) aims to train a binary classification model when only positive and unlabeled examples are available. Typically, learners assume that there is a labeling mechanism that determines which positive labels are observed. A particularly challenging setting arises when the observed positive labels are a biased sample from the positive distribution. Current approaches either require estimating the propensity scores, which are the instance-specific probabilities that a positive example’s label will be observed, or make overly restricting assumptions about the labeling mechanism. We make a novel assumption about the labeling mechanism which we show is more general than several commonly used existing ones. Moreover, the combination of our novel assumption and theoretical results from robust statistics can simplify the process of learning from biased PU data. Empirically, our approach offers superior predictive and run time performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods.
Pawel Teisseyre, Timo Martens, Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis
AISTATS2
2025 Compressing tree ensembles through Level-wise Optimization and Pruning
abstract
Tree ensembles (e.g., gradient boosting decision trees) are often used in practice because they offer excellent predictive performance while still being easy and efficient to learn. In some contexts, it is important to additionally optimize their size: this is specifically the case when models need to have verifiable properties (verification of fairness, robustness, etc. is often exponential in the ensemble's size), or when models run on battery-powered devices (smaller ensembles consume less energy, increasing battery autonomy). For this reason, compression of tree ensembles is worth studying. This paper presents LOP, a method for compressing a given tree ensemble by pruning or entirely removing trees in it, while updating leaf predictions in such a way that predictive accuracy is mostly unaffected. Empirically, LOP achieves compression factors that are often 10 to 100 times better than that of competing methods.
Laurens Devos, Timo Martens, Deniz Can Oruc, Wannes Meert, Hendrik Blockeel, Jesse Davis
ICML2
2023 Semi-supervised Learning from Active Noisy Soft Labels for Anomaly Detection
Timo Martens, Lorenzo Perini, Jesse Davis
ECML/PKDD (1)1