Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elvin Yang
dblp:357/1168
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 79% Motion planning and robot control · 21% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › human-robot collaboration
collaborative transportation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Communication in Human-Robot Collaborative Transport · HRI 2025 |
Human-robot interaction › robot communication
implicit communication |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Communication in Human-Robot Collaborative Transport · HRI 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation
terrain-aware navigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Wait, That Feels Familiar: Learning to Extrapolate Human Preferences for Preference-Aligned Path Planning · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Communication in Human-Robot Collaborative Transport · HRI 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual navigation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Wait, That Feels Familiar: Learning to Extrapolate Human Preferences for Preference-Aligned Path Planning · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic inference · 1.7model predictive control · 1.7representation learning · 0.8nearest neighbor search · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Implicit Communication in Human-Robot Collaborative TransportabstractWe focus on human-robot collaborative transport, in which a robot and a user collaboratively move an object to a goal pose. In the absence of explicit communication, this problem is challenging because it demands tight implicit coordination between two heterogeneous agents, who have very different sensing, actuation, and reasoning capabilities. Our key insight is that the two agents can coordinate fluently by encoding subtle, communicative signals into actions that affect the state of the transported object. To this end, we design an inference mechanism that probabilistically maps observations of joint actions executed by the two agents to a set of joint strategies of workspace traversal. Based on this mechanism, we define a cost representing the human's uncertainty over the unfolding traversal strategy and introduce it into a model predictive controller that balances between uncertainty minimization and efficiency maximization. We deploy our framework on a mobile manipulator (Hello Robot Stretch) and evaluate it in a within-subjects lab study$(N=24)$. We show that our framework enables greater team performance and empowers the robot to be perceived as a significantly more fluent and competent partner compared to baselines lacking a communicative mechanism. Elvin Yang, Christoforos I. Mavrogiannis |
HRI | 1 |
| 2024 | Wait, That Feels Familiar: Learning to Extrapolate Human Preferences for Preference-Aligned Path PlanningabstractAutonomous mobility tasks such as last-mile delivery require reasoning about operator-indicated preferences over terrains on which the robot should navigate to ensure both robot safety and mission success. However, coping with out of distribution data from novel terrains or appearance changes due to lighting variations remains a fundamental problem in visual terrain-adaptive navigation. Existing solutions either require labor-intensive manual data re-collection and labeling or use hand-coded reward functions that may not align with operator preferences. In this work, we posit that operator preferences for visually novel terrains, which the robot should adhere to, can often be extrapolated from established terrain preferences within the inertial-proprioceptive-tactile domain. Leveraging this insight, we introduce Preference extrApolation for Terrain-awarE Robot Navigation (PATERN), a novel framework for extrapolating operator terrain preferences for visual navigation. PATERN learns to map inertial-proprioceptive-tactile measurements from the robot’s observations to a representation space and performs nearest-neighbor search in this space to estimate operator preferences over novel terrains. Through physical robot experiments in outdoor environments, we assess PATERN’s capability to extrapolate preferences and generalize to novel terrains and challenging lighting conditions. Compared to baseline approaches, our findings indicate that PATERN1robustly generalizes to diverse terrains and varied lighting conditions, while navigating in a preference-aligned manner. Haresh Karnan, Elvin Yang, Garrett Warnell, Joydeep Biswas, Peter Stone 0001 |
ICRA | 2 |