Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Salvador Jasin
dblp:357/1774
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 77% Computational social science and digital humanities · 23% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computing education › STEM education
data science education |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | How to Data in Datathons · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
framework · 0.7case study · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | How to Data in DatathonsabstractThe rise of datathons, also known as data or data science hackathons, has provided a platform to collaborate, learn, and innovate quickly. Despite their significant potential benefits, organizations often struggle to effectively work with data due to a lack of clear guidelines and best practices for potential issues that might arise. Drawing on our own experiences and insights from organizing +80 datathon challenges with +60 partnership organizations since 2016, we provide a guide that serves as a resource for organizers to navigate the data-related complexities of datathons. We apply our proposed framework to 10 case studies. Carlos Mougan, Richard Plant, Clare Teng, Marya Bazzi, Alvaro Cabrejas Egea, Ryan Sze-Yin Chan, David Salvador Jasin, Martin Stoffel, Kirstie J. Whitaker, Jules Manser |
NeurIPS | 7 |