Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Krawciw

dblp:357/3237 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-0281-1050ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 91% Motion planning and robot control · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
odometry
0.912025
Radar Teach and Repeat: Architecture and Initial Field Testing · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
radar odometry
0.912025
Radar Teach and Repeat: Architecture and Initial Field Testing · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › route navigation
teach-and-repeat navigation
0.912025
Radar Teach and Repeat: Architecture and Initial Field Testing · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
path following
0.312025
Radar Teach and Repeat: Architecture and Initial Field Testing · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gyro integration · 0.9FMCW scanning radar · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Radar Teach and Repeat: Architecture and Initial Field Testing
abstract
Frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) scanning radar has emerged as an alternative to spinning LiDAR for state estimation on mobile robots. Radar's longer wavelength is less affected by small particulates, providing operational advantages in challenging environments such as dust, smoke, and fog. This paper presents Radar Teach and Repeat (RT&R): a full-stack radar system for long-term off-road robot autonomy. RT&R can drive routes reliably in off-road cluttered areas without any GPS. We benchmark the radar system's closed-loop path-tracking performance and compare it to its 3D LiDAR counterpart. 11.8 km of autonomous driving was completed without interventions using only radar and gyro for navigation. RT&R was evaluated on four different routes with progressively less structured scene geometry. RT&R achieved lateral path-tracking root mean squared errors (RMSE) of 5.6 cm, 7.5 cm, and 12.1 cm as the routes became more challenging. These RMSE values are less than half of the width of one tire (24 cm) on our robot testing platform. These same routes have worst-case errors of 21.7 cm, 24.0 cm, and 43.8 cm. We conclude that radar is a viable alternative to LiDAR for long-term autonomy in challenging off-road scenarios. The implementation of RT&R is open-source and available at: https://github.com/utiasASRL/vtr3.
Xinyuan Qiao, Alexander Krawciw, Sven Lilge, Tim D. Barfoot
ICRA2
2025 UAV See, UGV Do: Aerial Imagery and Virtual Teach Enabling Zero-Shot Ground Vehicle Repeat
abstract
This paper presents Virtual Teach and Repeat (VirT&R): an extension of the Teach and Repeat (T&R) framework that enables GPS-denied, zero-shot autonomous ground vehicle navigation in untraversed environments. VirT&R leverages aerial imagery captured for a target environment to train a Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) model so that dense point clouds and photo-textured meshes can be extracted. The NeRF mesh is used to create a high-fidelity simulation of the environment for piloting an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) to virtually define a desired path. The mission can then be executed in the actual target environment by using NeRF-generated point cloud submaps associated along the path and an existing LiDAR Teach and Repeat (LT&R) framework. We benchmark the repeatability of VirT&R on over 12 km of autonomous driving data using physical markings that allow a sim-to-real lateral path-tracking error to be obtained and compared with LT&R. VirT&R achieved measured root mean squared errors (RMSE) of 19.5 cm and 18.4 cm in two different environments, which are slightly less than one tire width (24 cm) on the robot used for testing, and respective maximum errors were 39.4 cm and 47.6 cm. This was done using only the NeRF-derived teach map, demonstrating that VirT&R has similar closed-loop path-tracking performance to LT&R but does not require a human to manually teach the path to the UGV in the actual environment.
Desiree Fisker, Alexander Krawciw, Sven Lilge, Melissa Greeff, Tim D. Barfoot
IROS2