Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jayaram Reddy

dblp:357/3388 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
3D vision · 63% Motion planning and robot control · 32% Generative modeling · 5%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene reconstruction
0.912025
Leveraging 2D Priors and SDF Guidance for Dynamic Urban Scene Rendering · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › novel view synthesis
dynamic view synthesis
0.912025
Leveraging 2D Priors and SDF Guidance for Dynamic Urban Scene Rendering · ICCV 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › learning-based motion planning
diffusion-based motion planning
0.812024
EDMP: Ensemble-of-costs-guided Diffusion for Motion Planning · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.812024
EDMP: Ensemble-of-costs-guided Diffusion for Motion Planning · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › image registration › multimodal registration
RGB-D registration
0.812024
Leveraging Cycle-Consistent Anchor Points for Self-Supervised RGB-D Registration · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
novel view synthesis
0.312025
Leveraging 2D Priors and SDF Guidance for Dynamic Urban Scene Rendering · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.212024
EDMP: Ensemble-of-costs-guided Diffusion for Motion Planning · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.212024
Leveraging Cycle-Consistent Anchor Points for Self-Supervised RGB-D Registration · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

signed distance function · 0.9point tracking · 0.93d gaussian splatting · 0.9transformation synchronization · 0.8ensemble of costs · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8GRU recurrent unit · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Leveraging 2D Priors and SDF Guidance for Dynamic Urban Scene Rendering
abstract
Dynamic scene rendering and reconstruction play a crucial role in computer vision and augmented reality. Recent methods based on 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS), have enabled accurate modeling of dynamic urban scenes, but for urban scenes they require both camera and LiDAR data, ground-truth 3D segmentations and motion data in the form of tracklets or pre-defined object templates such as SMPL. In this work, we explore whether a combination of 2D object agnostic priors in the form of depth and point tracking coupled with a signed distance function (SDF) representation for dynamic objects can be used to relax some of these requirements. We present a novel approach that integrates Signed Distance Functions (SDFs) with 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) to create a more robust object representation by harnessing the strengths of both methods. Our unified optimization framework enhances the geometric accuracy of 3D Gaussian splatting and improves deformation modeling within the SDF, resulting in a more adaptable and precise representation. We demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in rendering metrics even without LiDAR data on urban scenes. When incorporating LiDAR, our approach improved further in reconstructing and generating novel views across diverse object categories, without ground-truth 3D motion annotation. Additionally, our method enables various scene editing tasks, including scene decomposition, and scene composition.
Siddharth Tourani, Jayaram Reddy, Akash Kumbar, Satyajit Tourani, Nishant Goyal, K. Madhava Krishna, N. Dinesh Reddy, Muhammad Haris Khan
ICCV2
2024 EDMP: Ensemble-of-costs-guided Diffusion for Motion Planning
abstract
Classical motion planning for robotic manipulation includes a set of general algorithms that aim to minimize a scene-specific cost of executing a given plan. This approach offers remarkable adaptability, as they can be directly used off-the-shelf for any new scene without needing specific training datasets. However, without a prior understanding of what diverse valid trajectories are and without specially designed cost functions for a given scene, the overall solutions tend to have low success rates within a certain time limit. While deep-learning-based algorithms tremendously improve success rates, they are much harder to adopt without specialized training datasets. We propose EDMP, an Ensemble-of-costs-guided Diffusion for Motion Planning that aims to combine the strengths of classical and deep-learning-based motion planning. Our diffusion-based network is trained on a set of diverse kinematically valid trajectories. Like classical planning, for any new scene at the time of inference, we compute scene-specific costs such as "collision cost" and guide the diffusion to generate valid trajectories that satisfy the scene-specific constraints. Further, instead of a single cost function that may be insufficient in capturing diversity across scenes, we use an ensemble of costs to guide the diffusion process, significantly improving the success rate compared to classical planners. EDMP performs comparably with SOTA deep-learning-based methods while retaining the generalization capabilities primarily associated with classical planners.
Kallol Saha, Vishal Reddy Mandadi, Jayaram Reddy, Ajit Srikanth, Aditya Agarwal, Bipasha Sen, Arun Kumar Singh 0001, K. Madhava Krishna
ICRA3
2024 Leveraging Cycle-Consistent Anchor Points for Self-Supervised RGB-D Registration
abstract
With the rise in consumer depth cameras, a wealth of unlabeled RGB-D data has become available. This prompts the question of how to utilize this data for geometric reasoning of scenes. While many RGB-D registration methods rely on geometric and feature-based similarity, we take a different approach. We use cycle-consistent keypoints as salient points to enforce spatial coherence constraints during matching, improving correspondence accuracy. Additionally, we introduce a novel pose block that combines a GRU recurrent unit with transformation synchronization, blending historical and multi-view data. Our approach surpasses previous self-supervised registration methods on ScanNet and 3DMatch, even outperforming some older supervised methods. We also integrate our components into existing methods, showing their effectiveness.
Siddharth Tourani, Jayaram Reddy, Sarvesh Thakur, K. Madhava Krishna, Muhammad Haris Khan, N. Dinesh Reddy
ICRA2