Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zifan Gu

dblp:357/3850 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8024-2629ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Language models and text generation · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › biomedical text mining
clinical information extraction
0.912025
ClinBench: A Standardized Multi-Domain Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Clinical Information Extraction · NeurIPS 2025
Medical and health informatics › clinical text processing
clinical information extraction
0.912025
ClinBench: A Standardized Multi-Domain Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Clinical Information Extraction · NeurIPS 2025
Medical and health informatics
clinical text processing
0.912025
ClinBench: A Standardized Multi-Domain Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Clinical Information Extraction · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.312025
ClinBench: A Standardized Multi-Domain Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Clinical Information Extraction · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompting · 1.7JSON schema validation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ClinBench: A Standardized Multi-Domain Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Clinical Information Extraction
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) offer substantial promise for clinical natural language processing (NLP); however, a lack of standardized benchmarking methodologies limits their objective evaluation and practical translation. To address this gap, we introduce ClinBench, an open-source, multi-model, multi-domain benchmarking framework. ClinBench is designed for the rigorous evaluation of LLMs on important structured information extraction tasks (e.g., tumor staging, histologic diagnoses, atrial fibrillation, and social determinants of health) from unstructured clinical notes. The framework standardizes the evaluation pipeline by: (i) operating on consistently structured input datasets; (ii) employing dynamic, YAML-based prompting for uniform task definition; and (iii) enforcing output validation via JSON schemas, supporting robust comparison across diverse LLM architectures. We demonstrate ClinBench through a large-scale study of 11 prominent LLMs (e.g., GPT-4o series, LLaMA3 variants, Mixtral) across three clinical domains using configurations of public datasets (TCGA for lung cancer, MIMIC-IV-ECG for atrial fibrillation, and MIMIC notes for SDOH). Our results reveal significant performance-efficiency trade-offs. For example, when averaged across the four benchmarked clinical extraction tasks, GPT-3.5-turbo achieved a mean F1 score of 0.83 with a mean runtime of 16.8 minutes. In comparison, LLaMA3.1-70b obtained a similar mean F1 of 0.82 but required a substantially longer mean runtime of 42.7 minutes. GPT-4o-mini also presented a favorable balance with a mean F1 of 0.81 and a mean runtime of 13.4 minutes. ClinBench provides a unified, extensible framework and empirical insights for reproducible, fair LLM benchmarking in clinical NLP. By enabling transparent and standardized evaluation, this work advances data-centric AI research, informs model selection based on performance, cost, and clinical priorities, and supports the effective integration of LLMs into healthcare. The framework and evaluation code are publicly available at https://github.com/ismaelvillanuevamiranda/ClinBench/.
Ismael Villanueva-Miranda, Zifan Gu, Donghan M. Yang, Kuroush Nezafati, Jingwei Huang 0002, Peifeng Ruan, Xiaowei Zhan, Guanghua Xiao
NeurIPS2
2025 SBDH-Reader: a large language model-powered method for extracting social and behavioral determinants of health from clinical notes
abstract
OBJECTIVE: Social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDH) are increasingly recognized as essential for prognostication and informing targeted interventions. Clinical notes often contain details about SBDH in unstructured format. Conventional extraction methods for these data tend to be labor intensive, inaccurate, and/or unscalable. In this study, we aim to develop and validate a large language model (LLM)-powered method to extract structured SBDH data from clinical notes through prompt engineering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed SBDH-Reader to extract 6 categories of granular SBDH data by prompting GPT-4o, including employment, housing, marital status, and substance use including alcohol, tobacco, and drug use. SBDH-Reader was developed using 7225 notes from 6382 patients in the MIMIC-III database (2001-2012) and externally validated using 971 notes from 437 patients at The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW; 2022-2023). We evaluated SBDH-Reader's performance against human-annotated ground truths based on precision, recall, F1, and confusion matrix. RESULTS: When tested on the UTSW validation set, SBDH-Reader achieved a macro-average F1 ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 across 6 SBDH categories. For clinically relevant adverse attributes, F1 ranged from 0.96 (employment; housing) to 0.99 (tobacco use). When extracting any adverse attributes across all SBDH categories, SBDH-Reader achieved an F1 of 0.97, recall of 0.97, and precision of 0.98 in the independent validation set. DISCUSSION: SBDH-Reader demonstrated strong performance in extracting structured SBDH data through effective prompt engineering of a general-purpose LLM, without the need for task-specific fine-tuning. Its modular design and adaptability to diverse datasets and documentation patterns support its applicability in real-world clinical settings. CONCLUSION: SBDH-Reader has the potential to serve as a scalable and effective method for collecting real-time, patient-level SBDH data to support clinical research and care.
Zifan Gu, Lesi He, Awais Naeem, Pui Man Chan, Asim Mohamed, Hafsa Khalil, Yujia Guo, Jingwei Huang 0002, Ismael Villanueva-Miranda, Ying Ding 0001, Wenqi Shi 0002, Matthew E. Dupre, Guanghua Xiao, Eric D. Peterson, Ann Marie Navar, Donghan M. Yang
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.1