Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Nicola Bariletto

dblp:357/4082 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% Optimization for machine learning · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 15%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.812024
Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
dirichlet process
0.812024
Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization
0.812024
Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.812024
Quasi-Monte Carlo for 3D Sliced Wasserstein · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
quasi-monte carlo
0.812024
Quasi-Monte Carlo for 3D Sliced Wasserstein · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
sliced wasserstein distance
0.812024
Quasi-Monte Carlo for 3D Sliced Wasserstein · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.212024
Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

smooth ambiguity aversion · 0.8randomized quasi-monte carlo · 0.8quasi-monte carlo · 0.8gradient-based optimization · 0.8dirichlet process · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Quasi-Monte Carlo for 3D Sliced Wasserstein
abstract
Monte Carlo (MC) integration has been employed as the standard approximation method for the Sliced Wasserstein (SW) distance, whose analytical expression involves an intractable expectation. However, MC integration is not optimal in terms of absolute approximation error. To provide a better class of empirical SW, we propose quasi-sliced Wasserstein (QSW) approximations that rely on Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods. For a comprehensive investigation of QMC for SW, we focus on the 3D setting, specifically computing the SW between probability measures in three dimensions. In greater detail, we empirically evaluate various methods to construct QMC point sets on the 3D unit-hypersphere, including the Gaussian-based and equal area mappings, generalized spiral points, and optimizing discrepancy energies. Furthermore, to obtain an unbiased estimator for stochastic optimization, we extend QSW to Randomized Quasi-Sliced Wasserstein (RQSW) by introducing randomness in the discussed point sets. Theoretically, we prove the asymptotic convergence of QSW and the unbiasedness of RQSW. Finally, we conduct experiments on various 3D tasks, such as point-cloud comparison, point-cloud interpolation, image style transfer, and training deep point-cloud autoencoders, to demonstrate the favorable performance of the proposed QSW and RQSW variants.
Nicola Bariletto, Nhat Ho
ICLR2
2024 Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization
abstract
Training machine learning and statistical models often involves optimizing a data-driven risk criterion. The risk is usually computed with respect to the empirical data distribution, but this may result in poor and unstable out-of-sample performance due to distributional uncertainty. In the spirit of distributionally robust optimization, we propose a novel robust criterion by combining insights from Bayesian nonparametric (i.e., Dirichlet process) theory and a recent decision-theoretic model of smooth ambiguity-averse preferences. First, we highlight novel connections with standard regularized empirical risk minimization techniques, among which Ridge and LASSO regressions. Then, we theoretically demonstrate the existence of favorable finite-sample and asymptotic statistical guarantees on the performance of the robust optimization procedure. For practical implementation, we propose and study tractable approximations of the criterion based on well-known Dirichlet process representations. We also show that the smoothness of the criterion naturally leads to standard gradient-based numerical optimization. Finally, we provide insights into the workings of our method by applying it to a variety of tasks based on simulated and real datasets.
Nicola Bariletto, Nhat Ho
NeurIPS1