Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tasneem Suha

dblp:357/6993 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-1278-2590ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 67% Systems and software security · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel countermeasures
masking
0.912025
POLARIS: Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Mitigating Power Side-Channel Leakage · DAC 2025
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
power analysis
0.912025
POLARIS: Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Mitigating Power Side-Channel Leakage · DAC 2025
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack
0.312026
DISARM: Target Electronic Device Informed Mitigation of Software Runtime Side-Channel Vulnerabilities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsupervised learning · 0.9explainable artificial intelligence · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DISARM: Target Electronic Device Informed Mitigation of Software Runtime Side-Channel Vulnerabilities
Tasneem Suha, Tanzim Mahfuz, Rima Asmar Awad, Prabuddha Chakraborty
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1
2025 POLARIS: Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Mitigating Power Side-Channel Leakage
abstract
Microelectronic systems are widely used in many sensitive applications (e.g., manufacturing, energy, defense). These systems increasingly handle sensitive data (e.g., encryption key) and are vulnerable to diverse threats, such as, power sidechannel attacks, which infer sensitive data through dynamic power profile. In this paper, we present a novel framework, POLARIS for mitigating power side channel leakage using an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) guided masking approach. POLARIS uses an unsupervised process to automatically build a tailored training dataset and utilize it to train a masking model. The POLARIS framework outperforms state-of-the-art mitigation solutions (e.g., VALIANT) in terms of leakage reduction, execution time, and overhead across large designs.
Tanzim Mahfuz, Sudipta Paria, Tasneem Suha, Swarup Bhunia, Prabuddha Chakraborty
DAC3
2025 SALTY: Explainable Artificial Intelligence Guided Structural Analysis for Hardware Trojan Detection
abstract
Hardware Trojans are malicious modifications in digital designs that can be inserted by untrusted supply chain entities. Hardware Trojans can give rise to diverse attack vectors such as information leakage (e.g. MOLES Trojan) and denial-of-service (rarely triggered bit flip). Such an attack in critical systems (e.g. healthcare and aviation) can endanger human lives and lead to catastrophic financial loss. Several techniques have been developed to detect such malicious modifications in digital designs, particularly for designs sourced from third-party intellectual property (IP) vendors. However, most techniques have scalability concerns (due to unsound assumptions during evaluation) and lead to large number of false positive detections (false alerts). Our framework (SALTY) mitigates these concerns through the use of a novel Graph Neural Network architecture (using Jumping-Knowledge mechanism) for generating initial predictions and an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approach for fine tuning the outcomes (post-processing). Experiments show > 98% True Positive Rate (TPR) and True Negative Rate (TNR), significantly outperforming state-of-the-art techniques across a large set of standard benchmarks.
Tanzim Mahfuz, Pravin Gaikwad, Tasneem Suha, Swarup Bhunia, Prabuddha Chakraborty
VTS3