Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bocheng Zhou
dblp:357/8144
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 56% Language models and text generation · 39% Question answering and dialogue systems · 6% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
test-time scaling |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Do We Truly Need So Many Samples? Multi-LLM Repeated Sampling Efficiently Scales Test-Time Compute · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Graph Attention is Not Always Beneficial: A Theoretical Analysis of Graph Attention Mechanisms via Contextual Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Graph Attention is Not Always Beneficial: A Theoretical Analysis of Graph Attention Mechanisms via Contextual Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Graph Attention is Not Always Beneficial: A Theoretical Analysis of Graph Attention Mechanisms via Contextual Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
answer verification |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Do We Truly Need So Many Samples? Multi-LLM Repeated Sampling Efficiently Scales Test-Time Compute · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Graph Attention is Not Always Beneficial: A Theoretical Analysis of Graph Attention Mechanisms via Contextual Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-consistency · 1.0sample consistency · 1.0graph attention network · 0.9contextual stochastic block model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Do We Truly Need So Many Samples? Multi-LLM Repeated Sampling Efficiently Scales Test-Time ComputeabstractThis paper presents a simple, effective, and cost-efficient strategy, named ModelSwitch, to improve LLM performance by scaling test-time compute. ModelSwitch builds upon the repeated-sampling-then-voting framework, with a novel twist: incorporating multiple models, even weaker ones, to leverage their complementary strengths that potentially arise from diverse training data and paradigms. By using sample consistency as a signal, our strategy dynamically switches between models. Theoretical analysis highlights the efficiency and performance advantages of our strategy. Extensive experiments on seven datasets demonstrate that our strategy not only outperforms self-consistency and state-of-the-art multi-agent debate approaches, but also significantly reduces inference costs. Additionally, our strategy requires only a few comparable LLMs to achieve optimal performance and can be extended with verification methods, demonstrating the potential of leveraging multiple LLMs in the generation-verification paradigm. Jianhao Chen 0001, Zishuo Xun, Bocheng Zhou, Hangfan Zhang, Qiaosheng Zhang 0002, Wei Hu 0007, Yuzhong Qu, Shuyue Hu |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | Graph Attention is Not Always Beneficial: A Theoretical Analysis of Graph Attention Mechanisms via Contextual Stochastic Block ModelsabstractDespite the growing popularity of graph attention mechanisms, their theoretical understanding remains limited. This paper aims to explore the conditions under which these mechanisms are effective in node classification tasks through the lens of Contextual Stochastic Block Models (CSBMs). Our theoretical analysis reveals that incorporating graph attention mechanisms is *not universally beneficial*. Specifically, by appropriately defining *structure noise* and *feature noise* in graphs, we show that graph attention mechanisms can enhance classification performance when structure noise exceeds feature noise. Conversely, when feature noise predominates, simpler graph convolution operations are more effective. Furthermore, we examine the over-smoothing phenomenon and show that, in the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime, graph convolutional networks suffer from over-smoothing, whereas graph attention mechanisms can effectively resolve this issue. Building on these insights, we propose a novel multi-layer Graph Attention Network (GAT) architecture that significantly outperforms single-layer GATs in achieving *perfect node classification* in CSBMs, relaxing the SNR requirement from $\omega(\sqrt{\log n})$ to $\omega(\sqrt{\log n} / \sqrt[3]{n})$. To our knowledge, this is the first study to delineate the conditions for perfect node classification using multi-layer GATs. Our theoretical contributions are corroborated by extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, highlighting the practical implications of our findings. Zhongtian Ma, Qiaosheng Zhang 0002, Bocheng Zhou, Yexin Zhang, Shuyue Hu, Zhen Wang 0004 |
ICML | 3 |