Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam Stefkovics

dblp:358/3386 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4961-7792ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization evaluation
trust in visualization
0.812024
Vistrust: a Multidimensional Framework and Empirical Study of Trust in Data Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2024
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization evaluation
user study
0.812024
Vistrust: a Multidimensional Framework and Empirical Study of Trust in Data Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multidimensional scaling · 0.8crowdsourced study · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Vistrust: a Multidimensional Framework and Empirical Study of Trust in Data Visualizations
abstract
Trust is an essential aspect of data visualization, as it plays a crucial role in the interpretation and decision-making processes of users. While research in social sciences outlines the multi-dimensional factors that can play a role in trust formation, most data visualization trust researchers employ a single-item scale to measure trust. We address this gap by proposing a comprehensive, multidimensional conceptualization and operationalization of trust in visualization. We do this by applying general theories of trust from social sciences, as well as synthesizing and extending earlier work and factors identified by studies in the visualization field. We apply a two-dimensional approach to trust in visualization, to distinguish between cognitive and affective elements, as well as between visualization and data-specific trust antecedents. We use our framework to design and run a large crowd-sourced study to quantify the role of visual complexity in establishing trust in science visualizations. Our study provides empirical evidence for several aspects of our proposed theoretical framework, most notably the impact of cognition, affective responses, and individual differences when establishing trust in visualizations.
Hamza Elhamdadi, Adam Stefkovics, Johanna Beyer, Eric Mörth, Hanspeter Pfister, Cindy Xiong Bearfield, Carolina Nobre
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.2