Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jessica Xu

dblp:358/4553 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Approximation and online algorithms · 38% Computational complexity · 12%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.812024
Are Graph Neural Networks Optimal Approximation Algorithms? · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing
0.812024
Are Graph Neural Networks Optimal Approximation Algorithms? · NeurIPS 2024
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.812024
Are Graph Neural Networks Optimal Approximation Algorithms? · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › convex relaxation
semidefinite relaxation
0.812024
Are Graph Neural Networks Optimal Approximation Algorithms? · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.212024
Are Graph Neural Networks Optimal Approximation Algorithms? · NeurIPS 2024
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
Max-CSP
0.212024
Are Graph Neural Networks Optimal Approximation Algorithms? · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semidefinite programming · 1.5convex relaxation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Evaluating the Impact of Workshop Interventions on AI Literacy and STEM Career Aspirations with Australian Secondary Students
Christian Bergh, Alexandra Vassar, Natasha Banks, Jessica Xu, Jake Renzella
AIED (6)4
2024 Are Graph Neural Networks Optimal Approximation Algorithms?
abstract
In this work we design graph neural network architectures that capture optimal approximation algorithms for a large class of combinatorial optimization problems, using powerful algorithmic tools from semidefinite programming (SDP). Concretely, we prove that polynomial-sized message-passing algorithms can represent the most powerful polynomial time algorithms for Max Constraint Satisfaction Problems assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. We leverage this result to construct efficient graph neural network architectures, OptGNN, that obtain high quality approximate solutions on landmark combinatorial optimization problems such as Max-Cut, Min-Vertex-Cover, and Max-3-SAT. Our approach achieves strong empirical results across a wide range of real-world and synthetic datasets against solvers and neural baselines. Finally, we take advantage of OptGNN’s ability to capture convex relaxations to design an algorithm for producing bounds on the optimal solution from the learned embeddings of OptGNN.
Morris Yau, Nikolaos Karalias, Eric Lu, Jessica Xu, Stefanie Jegelka
NeurIPS4